- 1 - UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 75 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/13/2009

Page 1 of 5 - 2 - JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08- 80993-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY AND/OR CONTINUE ACTION Plaintiffs, JANE DOES 2-7, by and through undersigned counsel, file this Motion for Enlargement to Time to File Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action, pursuant to S.D. Fla.L.R. 7.1 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b), and state as follows: 1. Defendant Epstein filed a Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for Time Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings, in each of the above-captioned cases, on March 25, 2009. Plaintiffs response to this Motion is due on April 13, 2009. 2. Plaintiffs move for an enlargement of time to prepare and file their responses to the Motion because of demands on Plaintiffs’ counsel in other cases and matters. In particular, Plaintiffs’ counsel has an initial appeal brief due in Doe v. School Bd. of Broward County and Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 75 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/13/2009

Page 2 of 5 - 3 - Scavella, case no. 09 -10394-E, Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. 3. Plaintiffs request an enlargement of time of ten (10) days, until April 23, 2009. 4. Pursuant to S.D.Fla.L.R. 7.1(A), Plaintiffs’ counsel has conferred with counsel for Defendant regarding the relief sought in this Motion, who has advised Plaintiffs’ counsel that Defendant has no objection to the enlargement of time requested. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request an enlargement of time to file their response to the Motion to Stay et al., until and including April 23, 2009. Dated: April 23, 2009 Respectfully submitted, By: s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) [email protected] Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) [email protected] MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 75 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/13/2009

Page 3 of 5 - 4 - CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on April 23, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing. /s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein . Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 75 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/13/2009

Page 4 of 5 - 5 - SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] /s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 75 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/13/2009