Epstein Secrets

it off: it was Reince Priebus’s fault, not hers. She had spent a good part of the day calling friends and allies in the political world and blaming Priebus. Now she briefed some of the television producers and anchors with whom she’d built strong relationships—and with whom, actively interviewing in the

ce director and then finance director of the Republican National Committee, and finally, pre-White House, chief of staff of the RNC and its chairman, Reince Priebus. In retrospect, the key moment in saving the Trump campaign might be less the Mercer- led takeover and imposition of Bannon and Conway in mid-August

k as soon as they could raise other money. (Steve Mnuchin, then the campaign’s finance chairman, came to co

han likely.” In the end, the best Trump would do is loan the campaign $10 million, provided he got it back as soon as they could raise other money. (Steve Mnuchin, then the campaign’s finance chairman, came to collect the loan with the wire instructions ready to go, so Trump couldn’t conveniently forget to send

ive. As well, he could turn him off, and Bannon would be tactically quiet until turned on again. Kushner had neither Bannon’s policy imagination nor Priebus’s institutional ties. But, of course, he had family status, carrying its own high authority. In addition, he had billionaire status. He had cultivate

e president left the West Wing for Marine One, which was soon en route to Andrews Air Force Base. Accompanying him were Steve Bannon, Stephen Miller, Reince Priebus, Hope Hicks, and Kellyanne Conway. Vice President Pence and his wife joined the group at Andrews for the brief flight on Air Force One to Harrisburg,

alism, and that is Wilbur Ross at Commerce, Steve Mnuchin at Treasury, [Robert] Lighthizer at Trade, Peter

ence, defense department, homeland security. The second line of work is what I refer to as economic nationalism, and that is Wilbur Ross at Commerce, Steve Mnuchin at Treasury, [Robert] Lighthizer at Trade, Peter Navarro, [and] Stephen Miller, who are rethinking how we are going to reconstruct our trade arrangem

egic approach on the part of the president—quite an unlikely development. Meanwhile, the couple blamed everyone else in the White House. They blamed Priebus for the disarray that had produced a warlike atmosphere that propelled constant and damaging leaks, they blamed Bannon for leaking, and they blamed S

in his unquestioned certitudes. There was now a fair amount of back-of-the-classroom giggling about who had called Trump what. For Steve Mnuchin and Reince Priebus, he was an “idiot.” For Gary Cohn, he was “dumb as shit.” For H. R. McMaster he was a “dope.” The list went on. Tillerson would merely become yet an

lating news conference, all eyes were suddenly on Kelly—this was his baptism of Trump fire. Spicer, Priebus, Cohn, Powell, Bannon, Tillerson, Mattis, Mnuchin—virtually the entire senior staff and cabinet of the Trump presidency, past and present, had traveled through the stages of adventure, challenge, fru

dent if not serene in his unquestioned certitudes. There was now a fair amount of back-of-the-classroom giggling about who had called Trump what. For Steve Mnuchin and Reince Priebus, he was an “idiot.” For Gary Cohn, he was “dumb as shit.” For H. R. McMaster he was a “dope.” The list went on. Tillerson would m

ers for an in-depth exploration of his rising influence: "Mulvaney spends considerably less time with Trump than his two previous chiefs of staff, Reince Priebus and John F. Kelly. And the president has sometimes kept him out of the loop when making contentious foreign policy decisions, advisers say. At a r

, Mulvaney Page 17954 EFTA00047465 told attendees that he does not seek to control the president's tweeting, time or family, one attendee said. Priebus and Kelly had clashed with the president over his Twitter statements and the influence of his eldest daughter and her husband. "Instead, Mulvaney

asked whether Mulvaney was a productive force. Shelby finally responded that Mulvaney was `engaged' before pointing out that (Treasury Secretary) Mnuchin was the lead negotiator on behalf of the administration in the fiscal talks." Alexander Acosta's resignation is the most recent illustration of Mu

fers for an in-depth exploration of his rising influence: "Mulvaney spends considerably less time with Trump than his two previous chiefs of staff, Reince Priebus and John F. Kelly. And the president has sometimes kept him out of the loop when making contentious foreign policy decisions, advisers say. At a r

ent donor retreat in Chicago, Mulvaney told attendees that he does not seek to control the president's tweeting, time or family, one attendee said. Priebus and Kelly had clashed with the president over his Twitter statements and the influence of his eldest daughter and her husband. "Instead, Mulvaney h

n asked whether Mulvaney was a productive force. Shelby finally responded that Mulvaney was 'engaged' before pointing out that (Treasury Secretary) Mnuchin was the lead negotiator on behalf of the administration in the fiscal talks." Alexander Acosta's resignation is the most recent illustration of Mu

From: Thomas Jr., Landon Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 2:52 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Trump Any further intel on Treasury? Priebus choice sugges=s to me that he may go for a bigger name in treasury than Mnuchin. Someone=to underscore/push forward this notion that he is Reagan 2.

hat he may go for a bigger name in treasury than Mnuchin. Someone=to underscore/push forward this notion t

bject: Re: Trump no intel but lots of profits On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:51 AM= Thomas Jr., Landon <mailto wrote: Any further intel on Treas=ry? Priebus choice suggests to me that he may go for a bigger name in trea=ury than Mnuchin. Someone to underscore/push forward this notion that he i= Reagan 2.

hat he may go for a bigger name in trea=ury than Mnuchin. Someone to underscore/push forward this notion t

ilcom» wrot=: no intel but lo=s of profits On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Thomas Jr., Landon <mailto > wrote: Any further intel on Treasury? Priebus choice suggests to me tha= he may go for a bigger name in treasury than Mnuchin. Someone to undersco=e/push forward this notion that he is Reagan 2.

omas Jr., Landon <mailto > wrote: Any further intel on Treasury? Priebus choice suggests to me tha= he may go for a bigger name in treasury than Mnuchin. Someone to undersco=e/push forward this notion that he is Reagan 2.0 (as some are suggesting).=l am just not sure who that person would be. The Tru

g-left:lex"> no intel but lots of p=ofits O= Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Thomas Jr., Landon O=a» <mailto wrote: Any further intel on Treasury? Priebus choice suggests to me that he ma= go for a bigger name in treasury than Mnuchin. Someone to underscore/push=forward this notion that he is Reagan 2.

hat he ma= go for a bigger name in treasury than Mnuchin. Someone to underscore/push=forward this notion t

ilto:[email protected]» wrote: no intel but lots of profits On Mon, Nov 14= 2016 at 9:51 AM, Thomas Jr., Landon Any furth=r intel on Treasury? Priebus choice suggests to me that he may go for a bi=ger name in treasury than Mnuchin. Someone to underscore/push forward this=notion that he is Reagan 2.

2016 at 9:51 AM, Thomas Jr., Landon Any furth=r intel on Treasury? Priebus choice suggests to me that he may go for a bi=ger name in treasury than Mnuchin. Someone to underscore/push forward this=notion that he is Reagan 2.0 (as some are suggesting). I am just not sure =ho that person would be. The Tru