Epstein Secrets

., and Spink, A. (2008) An Analysis of travel searching on the Web, Journal of Information Technology and Tourism. 10(2), 101-118. Jansen, B.J. and Mullen, T. (2008) Sponsored search: An overview of the concept, history, and technology, International Journal of Electronic Business. 6(2), 114 -131. Spi

76 EFTA00601652 Appendix B Testimony Cases Last Four Years Year Retained Deliverables Retained by Case 2016 Deposition Report Plaintiff Jane Doe v. Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc.; BHP Billiton Petroleum (Deepwater) Ltd.; Schlumberger Technology Corporation; Aramark Services, In

t "prejudice" the court should consider — "all relevant evidence is `prejudicial' in that it `may prejudice the party against whom it is admitted." Mullen v. Princess Anne Volunteer Fire Co., 853 F.2d 1130, 1134 (4th Cir. 1988). 4. The existence of unusual circumstances militating either for or again

is time because the issue of whether the Victim Victims' Rights Act even applies in this case is a matter between the government and Jane Doe I and Jane Doe 2 . . . To the extent the Court were to consider invalidating the Non-Prosecution Agreement as a remedy, Jeffrey Epstein reserves the right to interv

t "prejudice" the court should consider — "all relevant evidence is 'prejudicial' in that it 'may prejudice the party against whom it is admitted." Mullen v. Princess Anne Volunteer Fire Co., 853 F.2d 1130, 1134 (4th Cir. 1988). 4. The existence of unusual circumstances militating either for or again

intervene at this time because the issue of whether the Victim Victims' Rights Act even applies in this case is a matter between the government and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 . . . . To the extent the Court were to consider invalidating the Non-Prosecution Agreement as a remedy, Jeffrey Epstein reserves the

i we be Nato Link: (leo to be literfithilthlfwevelseknbearthdelylleive.e0m)- lento be linked Comments: frost : There will be a delay of up to 5 m Mullen DOOM your content appears. http://www.palrnbeachdai lynews.com/news/contenthiewS/2009/12/13/reiterdepo121309. h... 12/15/2009 EFTA00259987 Jeffre

woman who alleged that at 15-years- old she became what amounted to a sex slave for Epstein, according to court documents. The lawsuit — filed by Jane Doe 102 in May by Miami attorney Robert Jo- sefsberg — was dismissed Dec. 8 by a signed order from U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra, closing the case

odificat... 85:25 86:1 63:7,8 70:4 119:14 126:15 93:5,6 98:4 75:7,15 132:9 143:7 180:21 Mohammed 3:11 80:15,24 167:9 181:4 81:23 82:11 Mullen 81:2,10 169:12 mine molest 144:12 149:3 82:19 89:6 185:9 186:1 Mexico 89:19 163:14 164:11 166:11,21 167:1 170:24 172:1 6:25 24:23 min

t Las OHS 130.40Velt1 5 Page S41[91650 ran Lo, ie. FL 31394 6 DIRECT EXAMINATION By Mr. Edwards #5 7 CROSS-EXAMINATION On betel d Planter Jane Doe 2 through s By Ms. Ezell *190 T mERUELSTE1N 6 HOROWITZ. PA 9 CROSS-EXAMINATION By Mr. Willits #195 10 BY: JESSICA D. ARBOUR. ATTORMEY.AT4AW.

HOMAS x W JOANNA HARRISONNICTORIA BEAN x I n/a X LAUREN MURPHY/SERINA FIGUEROA x Y JULIE BRABON - JANE DOE #21? x Z EPSTEIN EMPLOYEES — Mullen, Hesse, Visoski x n/a no AA CHRISTINA MARTELL/JOHANNA SJOBERG Sjoberg x Martell x EFTA00190309

7/30/87) Q JANE DOE #17 (SHASDY . - 9/21/86)* x R JANE DOE #18 (JENNIFER L. - 2/8/87)* Laduke x S JANE DOE #19 (JENNIFER S. (7/28/88)* x x JANE DOE #20 (TATUM M. - 7/26/88)* n/a n/a n/a ANNIE & MARIA F. n/a Annie x Maria n/a n/a i ANGELA THOMAS x W JOANNA HARRISONNICTORIA BEAN x I

660 F.3d 149, 157 (2d Cir. 2011) ("the Fifth Amendment does not protect against hard choices" (internal quotation marks omitted)); United States v. Mullen, 536 F.2d 997, 1000 (2d Cir. 1976) (there is a difference between "those choices which are physically or psychologically coerced and those which ar

udge Netburn's Order On or about April 9, 2019, the Government advised Judge Netbum, who had not yet ruled on the Government's other application in Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein, et at, 17 Civ. 0616 (JGK) (SN), of Chief Judge McMahon's decision via a pane and sealed letter. (Def. Mot. 3, Ex. I). Subsequently,