Epstein Secrets

nd September 9, 2009 Omnibus Order (DE 293); and Manson v. United States, 244 U.S. 362, 365 (1917). More

areas that could result in criminal prosecution. Hubbell, 530 U.S. at 35-36. Accordingly, any compelled te

'the tlueat of prosecution is real, substantial and present."' See August 4, 2009 Order (DE 242) and September 9, 2009 Omnibus Order (DE 293); and Manson v. United States, 244 U.S. 362, 365 (1917). Moreover, as this court knows, the NPA only defers prosecution in the 6 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Doc

elf-incrimination may be invoked if the answer would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prosecute for a crime") and United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 36, 120 S.Ct. 2037, 2043 (2000). See in camera submissions for detailed argument applying the Fifth Amendment to the target offenses.

and September 9, 2009 Omnibus Order (DE 293); and Manson v. United States, 244 U.S. 362,365 (1917). More

mpelled testimonial aspect. See United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). Thus, where the exis

nto play only in those instances where the witness has "reasonable cause to apprehend danger from a direct answer." Hoffman 341 U.S. at 486 (citing Manson v. United States, 244 U.S. 362,365 (1917)). "The claimant must be 'confronted by substantial and 'real,' and not merely trifling or imaginary, haza

predictably used to bolster the criminal-related allegations against Epstein. See generally Hoffman v United States 341 US 479, 486 (1951), U.S. v Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 36 (2000). 11 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 282 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2009 Page 12 of 20 12 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KA