Epstein Secrets

, 2005 WL 2875220, at 4 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2005); Criminal Division's Victim Notification Program, U.S. Dep't of Justic

e leading case to date to assess this question is the Fifth Circuit's decision in In re Dean. °° There, a wealthy corpo

rorism cases to large numbers of victims. See, e.g., United States v. Ingrassia, No. CR-04-0455ADSJO, 2005 WL 2875220, at 4 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2005); Criminal Division's Victim Notification Program, U.S. Dep't of Justice, hittp://goo.gl/6H6IEk (last visited Dec. 4, 2013). 201 527 F.3d 391 (Sth Cir. 2008). DAVID SCHO

tion Leap Year March 15, 2007 ToFrom R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney Jeff Sloman, First Assistant United States Attorney M, Chief, Criminal Division MAUSA, Northern Region Chief, Northern Region 1. Introduction This memorandum seeks approval for the attached indictment charging Jeffrey Epstein

e activity was not "sexual enough" to qualify as "prostitution." Title 18 carries no definition of "prostitution." In United States v. Prince , the Fifth Circuit approved of the generic definition "sexual intercourse for hire" where the West Virginia statues also lacked a definition. Prince , 515 F.2d 564, 5

ion Leap Year April 17, 2007 ToFrom R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney Jeff Sloman. First Assistant United States Attorney W , Chief, Criminal Division , MAUSA, Northern Region Chief, Northern Region 1. Introduction This memorandum seeks approval for the attached indictment charging Jeffrey Epste

e activity was not "sexual enough" to qualify as "prostitution." Title 18 carries no definition of "prostitution." In United States v. Prince , the Fifth Circuit approved of the generic definition "sexual intercourse for hire" where the West Virginia statues also lacked a definition. Prince , 515 F.2d 564, 5

tion Leap Year January 31, 2007 ToFrom R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney Jeff Sloman. First Assistant United States Attorney er Chief, Criminal Division , MAUSA, Northern Region Chief, Northern Region I. Introduction This memorandum seeks approval for the attached indictment charging Jeffrey Epste

e activity was not "sexual enough" to qualify as "prostitution." Title 18 carries no definition of "prostitution." In United States v. Prince , the Fifth Circuit approved of the generic definition "sexual intercourse for hire" where the West Virginia statues also lacked a definition. Prince , 515 F.2d 564, 5

tion Leap Year April 30, 2007 ToFrom R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney Jeff Sloman. First Assistant United States Attorney M a, Chief, Criminal Division MAUSA, Northern Region , Chief, Northern Region 1. Introduction This memorandum se sairoval for the attached indictment charging Jeffrey Epstein,

e activity was not "sexual enough" to qualify as "prostitution." Title 18 carries no definition of "prostitution." In United States v. Prince , the Fifth Circuit approved of the generic definition "sexual intercourse for hire" where the West Virginia statues also lacked a definition. Prince , 515 F.2d 564, 5

mong other things, required parties to make it a crime to bribe foreign officials.” HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022505 Deputy Chief (FCPA Unit) Fraud Section, Criminal Division Bond Building 1400 New York Ave, N.W. Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 514-7023 Facsimile: (202) 514-7021 Email: [email protected] In 1998,

ring a market, or to circumvent a licensing or permit requirement, all satisfy the business purpose test. In 2004, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit addressed the business purpose test in United States v. Kay and held that bribes paid to obtain favorable tax treatment— which reduced a company’s cu

his time, he is not inclined to meet with counsel for Mr. Epstein. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney ...••••••• By: Chief, Criminal Division cc: Roy Black Gerald B. Lefcourt R. Alexander Acosta EFTA00179084 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY

974 'In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir. 1981) (en bane), the Eleventh Circuit adopted as precedent all decisions of the prior Fifth Circuit court of Appeals decided prior to October 1, 1981. -8- EFTA00179107 F.2d 127 (9th Cir. 1992); United States v. White, 950 F.2d 426, 430 (7th Cir.

in. The Fifth Circuit then remanded the matter to the district court to determine the appropriate remedy for the violation of the victims’ rights.° The Fifth Circuit’s decision in Dean has been cited favorably in four recent district court decisions, which provides further support for the conclusion that the CVRA ap

orism cases to large numbers of victims. See, e.g., United States v. Ingrassia, No. CR-04-0455ADSJO, 2005 WL 2875220, at *4 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2005); Criminal Division’s Victim Notification Program, U.S. DEP’T OF Justice, http://goo.gl/6H6IEk (last visited Dec. 4, 2013). HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014073 --- PAGE BREAK --- 20

/07) (2nd Revision 2/19/08) a ToFrom R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney Jeff Sloman, First Assistant United States Attorney M, Chief, Criminal Division MAUSA, Northern Region Chief, Northern Region I. Introduction This memorandum seeks a royal for the attached indictment charging Jeffrey Epstein

e activity was not "sexual enough" to qualify as "prostitution." Title 18 carries no definition of "prostitution." In United States v. Prince , the Fifth Circuit approved of the generic definition "sexual intercourse for hire". Prince , 515 F.2d 564, 566 (5th Cir. 1975). FI2 In 1946, the Supreme Court defin

n Leap Year (Revised 9/13/07) ToFrom R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney Jeff Sloman, First Assistant United States Attorney M, Chief, Criminal Division MAUSA, Northern Region Chief, Northern Region May 1, 2007 I. Introduction This memorandum seeks a royal for the attached indictment charging Jef

e activity was not "sexual enough" to qualify as "prostitution." Title 18 carries no definition of "prostitution." In United States v. Prince , the Fifth Circuit approved of the generic definition "sexual intercourse for hire". Prince , 515 F.2d 564, 566 (5th Cir. 1975). Fl In 1946, the Supreme Court define