Epstein Secrets

ply not only to references to unindicted co-conspirators in indictments and factual proffers, but also to motion papers. See, e.g., United States v. Anderson , 55 F. Supp. 2d 1163, 1168 (D. Kan. 1999) ("After carefully reviewing the government's moving papers on the conflict of interest issue, the court

he crimes which would be charged, and the number of persons who would be charged run afoul of the secrecy requirements codified in Rule 6(e). In re Grand Any Investigation , 610 F.2d at 217, 218. In light of these conflicting directives, the more conservative course is to treat all information related to grand jury pro

ply not only to references to unindicted co-conspirators in indictments and factual proffers, but also to motion papers. See, e.g., United States v. Anderson , 55 F. Supp. 2d 1163, 1168 (D. Kan. 1999) ("After carefully reviewing the government's moving papers on the conflict of interest issue, the court

he crimes which would be charged, and the number of persons who would be charged run afoul of the secrecy requirements codified in Rule 6(e). In re Grand Any Investigation , 610 F.2d at 217, 218. In light of these conflicting directives, the more conservative course is to treat all information related to grand jury pro

pply not only to references to unindicted co-conspirators in indictments and factual proffers, but also to motion papers. See, e.g., United States I Anderson , 55 F. Supp. 2d 1163, 1168 (D. Kan. 1999) ("After carefully reviewing the government's moving papers on the conflict of interest issue, the court

he crimes which would be charged, and the number of persons who would be charged run afoul of the secrecy requirements codified in Rule 6(e). In re Grand Any Investigation , 610 F.2d at 217, 218. In light of these conflicting directives, the more conservative course is to treat all information related to grand jury pro