Epstein Secrets

ply not only to references to unindicted co-conspirators in indictments and factual proffers, but also to motion papers. See, e.g., United States v. Anderson, 55 F. Supp. 2d 1163, 1168 (D. Kan. 1999) ("After carefully reviewing the government's moving papers on the conflict of interest issue, the court c

el). CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the United States respectfully requests that the Court deny, in part, Petitioners' Motion to Unseal its Motion for Finding of Violations of Crime Victim's Rights Act and Request for Hearing on Appropriate Remedies [DE48] and Exhibit A thereto and, instead, that the Court unseal only a redacted version of those p

pply not only to references to unindicted co-conspirators in indictments and factual proffers, but also to motion papers. See, e.g., United States I Anderson , 55 F. Supp. 2d 1163, 1168 (D. Kan. 1999) ("After carefully reviewing the government's moving papers on the conflict of interest issue, the court

el). CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the United States respectfully requests that the Court deny, in part, Petitioners' Motion to Unseal its Motion for Finding of Violations of Crime Victim's Rights Act and Request for Hearing on Appropriate Remedies [DE48] and Exhibit A thereto and, instead, that the Court unseal only a redacted version of those p

ply not only to references to unindicted co-conspirators in indictments and factual proffers, but also to motion papers. See, e.g., United States v. Anderson , 55 F. Supp. 2d 1163, 1168 (D. Kan. 1999) ("After carefully reviewing the government's moving papers on the conflict of interest issue, the court

el). CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the United States respectfully requests that the Court deny, in part, Petitioners' Motion to Unseal its Motion for Finding of Violations of Crime Victim's Rights Act and Request for Hearing on Appropriate Remedies [DE48] and Exhibit A thereto and, instead, that the Court unseal only a redacted version of those p

pply not only to references to unindicted co-conspirators in indictments and factual proffers, but also to motion papers. See, e.g., United States I Anderson , 55 F. Supp. 2d 1163, 1168 (D. Kan. 1999) ("After carefully reviewing the government's moving papers on the conflict of interest issue, the court

ers, CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the United States respectfully requests that the Court deny, in part, Petitioners' Motion to Unseal its Motion for Finding of Violations of Crime Victim's Rights Act and Request for Hearing on Appropriate Remedies [DE48] and Exhibit thereto and, instead, that the Court unseal only a redacted version of those ple