Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
6-CV-2242 (VEC), 2020 WL 1503452, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020) (quoting 4 Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.03 (2019)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 101 (2d Cir. 2001) (explaining that "the district court should not admit testimony that is 'directed solely to lay matters which a ju
ite common[ ]" and accepted in the academic literature. 385 F. Supp. 3d at 263. Identical testimony was admitted by Judge Furman in United States v. Dupigny, No. 18- Cr.-528 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. 2019), Dkt. No. 198 at 27, by Judge Engelmayer in United States v. Randall, 19 Cr. 131 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. 2020), Dkt.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
6-CV-2242 (VEC), 2020 WL 1503452, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020) (quoting 4 Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.03 (2019)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 101 (2d Cir. 2001) (explaining that "the district court should not admit testimony that is 'directed solely to lay matters which a ju
ite common[ ]" and accepted in the academic literature. 385 F. Supp. 3d at 263. Identical testimony was admitted by Judge Furman in United States v. Dupigny, No. 18- Cr.-528 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. 2019), Dkt. No. 198 at 27, by Judge Engelmayer in United States v. Randall, 19 Cr. 131 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. 2020), Dkt.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
6-CV-2242 (VEC), 2020 WL 1503452, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020) (quoting 4 Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.03 (2019)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 101 (2d Cir. 2001) (explaining that "the district court should not admit testimony that is 'directed solely to lay matters which a ju
ite common[ ]" and accepted in the academic literature. 385 F. Supp. 3d at 263. Identical testimony was admitted by Judge Furman in United States v. Dupigny, No. 18- Cr.-528 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. 2019), Dkt. No. 198 at 27, by Judge Engelmayer in United States v. Randall, 19 Cr. 131 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. 2020), Dkt.
Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA00016474
ite common[ ]" and accepted in the academic literature. 385 F. Supp. 3d at 263. Identical testimony was admitted by Judge Furman in United States v. Dupigny, No. 18- Cr.-528 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. 2019), Dkt. No. 198 at 27, by Judge Engelmayer in United States v. Randall, 19 Cr. 131 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. 2020), Dkt.
Page: EFTA00016474 →Page EFTA00016478
6-CV-2242 (VEC), 2020 WL 1503452, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020) (quoting 4 Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.03 (2019)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 101 (2d Cir. 2001) (explaining that "the district court should not admit testimony that is 'directed solely to lay matters which a ju
Page: EFTA00016478 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (55)
Entities connected to both Mulder and Dupigny
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON16 w/ Mulder·15 w/ Dupigny
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON15 w/ Mulder·13 w/ Dupigny
United States
LOCATION16 w/ Mulder·7 w/ Dupigny
Julie K. Brown
PERSON14 w/ Mulder·4 w/ Dupigny
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON14 w/ Mulder·4 w/ Dupigny
the Second Circuit's
ORGANIZATION13 w/ Mulder·4 w/ Dupigny
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION13 w/ Mulder·3 w/ Dupigny
Torres
PERSON9 w/ Mulder·6 w/ Dupigny
Martinez
PERSON10 w/ Mulder·3 w/ Dupigny
WA
Walsh
PERSON10 w/ Mulder·2 w/ Dupigny
Rivera
PERSON10 w/ Mulder·2 w/ Dupigny
FU
Furman
PERSON4 w/ Mulder·8 w/ Dupigny
Prince Andrew
PERSON7 w/ Mulder·4 w/ Dupigny
RA
Randall
PERSON5 w/ Mulder·5 w/ Dupigny
RO
Rocchio
PERSON5 w/ Mulder·5 w/ Dupigny
DA
Daubert
PERSON5 w/ Mulder·5 w/ Dupigny
DB
Doug Band
PERSON8 w/ Mulder·2 w/ Dupigny
Russell Simmons
PERSON5 w/ Mulder·5 w/ Dupigny
NI
Nimely
PERSON5 w/ Mulder·4 w/ Dupigny
Harvey Weinstein
PERSON4 w/ Mulder·5 w/ Dupigny