Back to People & Entities
DU
Dupigny
Person
17
Total Mentions
17
Documents
90
Connected Entities
Surname reference in documents
The documents mention Dupigny in the context of court cases, specifically regarding evidentiary matters. Dupigny appears to be a defendant in a case, *United States v. Dupigny*, and the documents reference rulings and transcripts from that case concerning the admissibility of evidence.
Dupigny's name appears exclusively in legal documents as the defendant in *United States v. Dupigny*. These mentions relate to discussions of legal precedents, evidentiary rulings, and motions within the context of the case. There are no indications of involvement in the Epstein case beyond the shared legal context of the documents. Given the available information, the mentions appear to be incidental to the Epstein-related content of the documents.
Key Highlights
- •Dupigny is the defendant in the case *United States v. Dupigny*.
- •Mentions of Dupigny relate to legal arguments and rulings about evidence in their case.
- •The connection to Epstein files is through shared legal documents, not direct association.
Frequently Asked Questions
Books for Further Reading
Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
Julie K. Brown
Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open
Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
James Patterson
Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network
Relentless Pursuit: My Fight for the Victims of Jeffrey Epstein
Bradley J. Edwards
Victims' attorney's firsthand account
Document Mentions (17)
1 mention
131 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 29, 2020) (Dkt. No. 384) (setting a Rule 412 deadline of October 15, 2020, for a November 9, 2020 trial); United States v. Dupigny, 18 Cr. 528 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 23, 2019) (Dkt. No. 202) (requiring a "finalized proffer of evidence" the defense sought to admit under Rule 412 b
Page: EFTA00011158 →1 mention
ite common[ ]" and accepted in the academic literature. 385 F. Supp. 3d at 263. Identical testimony was admitted by Judge Furman in United States v. Dupigny, No. 18- Cr.-528 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. 2019), Dkt. No. 198 at 27, by Judge Engelmayer in United States v. Randall, 19 Cr. 131 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. 2020), Dkt.
Page: EFTA00016474 →1 mention
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 precluding the term "victim" is both unnecessary and impractical. United States v. Dupigny, 18 CR 528, transcript of October 17, 2019, Docket No. 198 at 50. It is appropriate for the government to use the terms as representative of its l
Page: EFTA00023369 →Sponsored
1 mention
ged crimes, nor must the Government provide a preview of the evidence or legal theories it intends to present at trial. See, e.g., United States v. Dupigny, 18 Cr. 528 (JMF), 2019 WL 2327697, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. May 30, 2019) (denying motion for bill of particulars and explaining that the defendant "need no
Page: EFTA00023912 →1 mention
ged crimes, nor must the Government provide a preview of the evidence or legal theories it intends to present at trial. See, e.g., United States v. Dupigny, 18 Cr. 528 (JMF), 2019 WL 2327697, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. May 30, 2019) (denying motion for bill of particulars and explaining that the defendant "need no
Page: EFTA00030945 →EFTA00040107.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00040107
ite common[ ]" and accepted in the academic literature. 385 F. Supp. 3d at 263. Identical testimony was admitted by Judge Furman in United States v. Dupigny, No. 18- Cr.-528 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. 2019), Dkt. No. 198 at 27, by Judge Engelmayer in United States v. Randall, 19 Cr. 131 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. 2020), Dkt.
Sponsored
EFTA00065522.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00065522
131 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 29, 2020) (Dkt. No. 384) (setting a Rule 412 deadline of October 15, 2020, for a November 9, 2020 trial); United States v. Dupigny, 18 Cr. 528 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 23, 2019) (Dkt. No. 202) (requiring a "finalized proffer of evidence" the defense sought to admit under Rule 412 b
EFTA00087185.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00087185
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 precluding the term "victim" is both unnecessary and impractical. United States v. Dupigny, 18 CR 528, transcript of October 17, 2019, Docket No. 198 at 50. It is appropriate for the government to use the terms as representative of its l
EFTA00088802.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00088802
ncluding the psychological relationship between pimps and the women prostituted by them"); Notice and Oct. 17, 2019 Tr. at 27:1-12, United States v. Dupigny, No. 18 Cr. 528 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. Nos. 180-1, 198 (permitting expert testimony on "the psychological relationship between a pimp and the woman
Sponsored
EFTA00094653.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00094653
ite common[ ]" and accepted in the academic literature. 385 F. Supp. 3d at 263. Identical testimony was admitted by Judge Furman in United States v. Dupigny, No. 18- Cr.-528 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. 2019), Dkt. No. 198 at 27, by Judge Engelmayer in United States v. Randall, 19 Cr. 131 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. 2020), Dkt.
EFTA00094642.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00094642
ite common[ ]" and accepted in the academic literature. 385 F. Supp. 3d at 263. Identical testimony was admitted by Judge Furman in United States v. Dupigny, No. 18- Cr.-528 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. 2019), Dkt. No. 198 at 27, by Judge Engelmayer in United States v. Randall, 19 Cr. 131 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. 2020), Dkt.
EFTA00099080.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00099080
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 precluding the term "victim" is both unnecessary and impractical. United States v. Dupigny, 18 CR 528, transcript of October 17, 2019, Docket No. 198 at 50. It is appropriate for the government to use the terms as representative of its l
Sponsored
EFTA00102335.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00102335
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 precluding the term "victim" is both unnecessary and impractical. United States v. Dupigny, 18 CR 528, transcript of October 17, 2019, Docket No. 198 at 50. It is appropriate for the government to use the terms as representative of its l
EFTA00147054.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00147054
, 29 Jan 2020 19:37:52 +0000 Importance: Normal I think the cases you have highlighted are a good representation of what we do with the CEHTTF. The Dupigny case was spun off from the Hard Knock HT investigation, which is a large trafficking case with dozens of targets and strong cross- programmatic ties
EFTA00147919.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00147919
29, 2020 2:37 PM, "a., I (NY) (FBI)" < wrote: I think the cases you have highlighted are a good representation of what we do with the CEHTTF. The Dupigny case was spun off from the Hard Knock HT investigation, which is a large trafficking case with dozens of targets and strong cross-programmatic ties
Sponsored
EFTA00147979.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00147979
n 29, 2020 2:37 PM, I (NY) (FBI)" <1 I> wrote: I think the cases you have highlighted are a good representation of what we do with the CEHTTF. The Dupigny case was spun off from the Hard Knock HT investigation, which is a large trafficking case with dozens of targets and strong cross- programmatic ties
EFTA00147976.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00147976
Jan 29, 2020 2:37 PM, I (NY) (FBI)" < > wrote: I think the cases you have highlighted are a good representation of what we do with the CEHTTF. The Dupigny case was spun off from the Hard Knock HT investigation, which is a large trafficking case with dozens of targets and strong cross- programmatic ties
Sponsored
Connected Entities(20 of 90)
Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)
15 docs15 co-mentions
Ghislaine Maxwell
PersonBritish socialite and sex trafficker, daughter of Robert Maxwell, accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein
13 docs13 co-mentions
FU
Furman
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
8 docs8 co-mentions
United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America
7 docs7 co-mentions
Torres
PersonAmbiguous surname - refers to multiple people in Epstein documents
6 docs6 co-mentions
TE
Telles
PersonSurname or name fragment in documents
5 docs5 co-mentions
Harvey Weinstein
PersonAmerican film producer and sex offender (born 1952)
5 docs5 co-mentions
MW
Michael Washburn
PersonPerson referenced in documents
5 docs5 co-mentions
Russell Simmons
PersonAmerican entrepreneur and record executive
5 docs5 co-mentions
Southern District
LocationFederal judicial district in New York City
5 docs5 co-mentions
HA
Halamek
PersonSurname or name fragment in documents
5 docs5 co-mentions
EN
Engelmayer
PersonRefers to Paul Engelmayer, US District Judge SDNY, in Epstein-related legal proceedings
5 docs5 co-mentions
RA
Raniere
PersonReference to Keith Raniere, NXIVM cult leader
5 docs5 co-mentions
RO
Rocchio
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
5 docs5 co-mentions
MI
Mizell
PersonSurname reference in documents
5 docs5 co-mentions
DA
Daubert
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
5 docs5 co-mentions
Raymond
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
5 docs5 co-mentions
RA
Randall
PersonAmbiguous first name - refers to multiple people in Epstein documents
5 docs5 co-mentions
RO
Romero
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
4 docs4 co-mentions
Prince Andrew
PersonThird child of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh (born 1960)
4 docs4 co-mentions