Epstein Secrets

ttorneys Office. The following items, as previously documented on OIG Form III-234/1, Evidence Custody Documents, were provided to SlAs Paritsky and Walker: • Log 1, Item 1 - Annual Refresher Training for March 2019 • Log 1, Item 2 - Annual Refresher Training for April 2019 • Log 2, Item 1 - 5:00 a

OP), Metropolitan Detention Center Brooklyn in New York. SA I previously received final disposition approval from Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York, United States Attorneys Office. The following items, as previously documented on OIG Form III-234/1, Evidence Custody Documents, were

anced that specific argument. 3. As you know, in our earlier pleadings filed months and months ago, we had repeatedly relied on cases such as US'. Walker, 98 F.3d 944 (7th Cir. 1996). Yet in your 13 page motion to dismiss, you did not discuss US' Walker or any of the case law that we had previously ci

need to obtain additional authorization from the Court under Fed.R.Cr.P. 6(e) to disclose the information supporting jurisdiction and venue in the Southern District of New York and the District of New Jersey. When you refer to "unsealing of all information," if you mean that such information would be publicly di

eement that called for court to unlawfully sentence the defendant by treating two misdemeanor offenses as felony offenses); see also United States" Walker, 98 F.3d 944, 946-47 (7th Cir. 1996) (concluding that judge was not compelled to impose a concurrent sentence where judge had erroneously represent

es Attorney 21 EFTA00205622 SERVICE LIST Jane Does 1 and 2 I. United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Brad Edwards, Esq., F E-mail: [email protected] Paul G. Cassell Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2 22 EFTA00205623

this issue when a defendant tried to disqualify prosecutors who had seen four documents that the defense alleged were privileged. United States v. Walker , 2007 WL 1743273 (2d Cir. Jun. 18, 2007). The court wrote: Even assuming the documents (or the handful of corrections and clarifications handwritt

ing filed under seal. Assistant U.S. Attorney SERVICE LIST In re Federal Grand Jury Subpoenas No. OLY-63 and OLY-64 United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Assistant U.S. Attorney U.S. Attorney's Office West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone: Facsimile: Attorney for United States EFTA0021

Haddad, Tonja 8/26/2013 For Educational Use Only Wolfe v. Foreman, — So.3d — (2013) 38 Fla. L. Weekly D1540 Co., 863 So.2d 1204, 1205 (Fla.2003); Walker v. Figarola, 59 So.3d 188, 189 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). The litigation privilege was first recognized in Florida in 1907 to provide legal immunity for

y litigation ultimately was settled. Ferrell, who was dissatisfied with the outcome, sued his partners in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ("the Federal case"). Ferrell's New York counsel retained the appellees, two Miami attorneys and their law firm (the "Miami Lawyers"), t

d this issue when a defendant tried to disqualify prosecutors who had seen four documents that the defense alleged were privileged. United States I Walker , 2007 WL 1743273 (2d Cir. Jun. 18, 2007). The court wrote: Even assuming the documents (or the handful of corrections and clarifications handwritt

ing filed under seal. Assistant U.S. Attorney SERVICE LIST In re Federal Grand Jury Subpoenas No. OLY-63 and OLY-64 United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for United States EFTA00223014 William L. Richey, Esq. Attorney for Subpoenaed Parties Riley Kiraly

ow if there's any more specificity on the date o was soon after she had moved to - visited a club with Matthew John Walker, who trafficked him - Walker spoke to individuals she believed were Epstein and Prince Andrew - saw the woman Prince Andrew was dancing with, believes it was - stared at them

red at them for some time - didn't hear the conversations - [attorneys not sure when she realized it was Prince Andrew] Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York EFTA00087075

efendant tried to disqualify prosecutors who had seen four documents that the defense alleged were privileged. -19- EFTA00179118 United States v. Walker, 2007 WL 1743273 (2d Cir. Jun. 18, 2007). The court wrote: Even assuming the documents (or the handful of corrections and clarifications handwritte

ida 33131. Phone: -• Fax: • www.RoyBlack.com EFTA00179070 •••gC •• • 4 (Re.. 06"2005)Scaled Document nuking Fonn UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Southern District of Florida Case Number: FGJ 07-103 (WPB) OLY•63 & OLY-64 IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM ISSUED TO WILLIAM RILEY Plaintiff Defendant Pa