Epstein Secrets

E LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein - 6 - Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 85 Entere

ties. Defendant also asserts without support or explanation that “confusion will result and motions in limine will undoubtedly be filed. . . .” In Ramsay v. Broward County Sheriff’s Office, 303 Fed. Appx. 761, 2008 WL 5237162 (11th Cir. 2008), the Court affirmed the District

E LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] /s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 66 Entered on

ing whether to consolidate actions, we have instructed that district courts should consider whether doing so could lead to prejudice or confusion.” Ramsay v. Broward County Sheriff’s Office, 2008 WL 5237162 *3 (11th Cir. 2008). The common and overlapping issues in this case, both factual and legal,

SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger. Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] /s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein - 10- EFTA00221685

ding whether to consolidate actions, we have instructed that district courts should consider whether doing so could lead to prejudice or confusion." Ramsay'. Broward County Sheriff's Office, 2008 WL 5237162 *3 (11th Cir. 2008). The common and overlapping issues in this case, both factual and legal, are

427'2009 Page 6 of 6 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Robert D. Critton, Esq. s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein - 6 - EFTA00221737

arties. Defendant also asserts without support or explanation that "confusion will result and motions in limine will undoubtedly be filed. . . ." In Ramsay,. Broward County Sheriff's Office, 303 Fed. Appx. 761, 2008 WL 5237162 (11th Cir. 2008), the Court affirmed the District ' In a case relied upon by