Epstein Secrets

ithout violating the Fifth Amendment”). See also Garner v. United States, 96 S.Ct. 1178, 424 U.S. 648 (1

ancial status is both relevant and admissible”); Interstate Narrow Fabrics, Inc. v. Century USA, Inc., 2004 WL 444 570 (M.D. N.C.

rimination claim because the government may use voluntarily filed tax returns against a defendant without violating the Fifth Amendment”). See also Garner v. United States, 96 S.Ct. 1178, 424 U.S. 648 (1976) (holding that disclosures in tax returns are not compelled incriminations and may be used as e

d that when a plaintiff seeks punitive damages against a defendant, evidence of the defendant’s financial status is both relevant and admissible”); Interstate Narrow Fabrics, Inc. v. Century USA, Inc., 2004 WL 444570 (M.D. N.C. 2004) (holding that tax returns are relevant to the jury’s determination of the amount of punitive

ithout violating the Fifth Amendment”). See also Garner v. United States, 96 S.Ct. 1178, 424 U.S. 648 (1

nancial status is both relevant and admissible”); Interstate Narrow Fabrics, Inc. v. Century USA, Inc., 2004 WL 444570 (M.D. N.C.