Epstein Secrets

doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim that would entitle him to relief." Id, (abrogating and quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 102, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)). The Supreme Court rejected the notion that "a wholly conclusory statement of claim [can

SON CASE NO.: 09-CV-80656-MARRA/JOHNSON PLAINTIFF, C.M.A.'S, EMERGENCY MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING THE DEPOSITIONS OF SUSAN POPE AND DR. SERGE THYS AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Plaintiff, C.M.A., by and through her undersigned attorneys, hereby files her Emergency Motion for Protective O

/2009 EFTA00182798 Page 7 of 11 162 F.3d 832 162 F.3d 832 (Cite as: 162 F.3d 832) ate standard of review is clear error. See Linked States v. Gibson, 48 F.3d 876, 878 (5th Cir.1995); Balls, 28 F.3d at 1409. We agree that this is the appropriate stand- ard for reviewing a district court's finding

through her undersigned attorneys, hereby files her Motion For Protective Order Regarding Treatment Records From Parent-Child Center, Inc. and Dr. Serge Thys and Incorporated Memorandum of Law, and in support there of states as follows: 1. This is an action to recover money damages against Defendant, J

doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim that would entitle him to relief." Id, (abrogating and quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 102, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)). The Supreme Court rejected the notion that "a wholly conclusory statement of claim [can

d: 06/05/2009) 06/05/2009 114 r 0.6 MB Plaintiff's MOTION for Protective Order Regarding Treatment Records From Parent-Child Centgrajugh and Dr. Serge Thys and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by .. (Hill, Jack) (Entered: 06/05/2009) 06/08/2009 115 r 3.8 MB RESPONSE to Motion re (91 in 9:08-cv-80119-