4
Shared Docs
2
Same-Page
4 / 10
Mentions
DEAR ATTORNEY GENERAL HOLDER: I am writing about the Justice Department’s im- plementation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act
was an obligation of “Colfficers and employees of the Department of Justice and other departments and agen- cies of the Unite
ng about the Justice Department’s im- plementation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act--an act that I co-sponsored in 2004. These questions relate to an Office of Legal Counsel (“OLC’’?) Opinion made public on May 20, 2011 and more broadly to concerns I have heard from crime victims’ advocates that the Department has
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012720 →ent 85-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/17/2011 Page 3 of 4 S3608 U.S. SENATE, Washington, DC, June 6, 2011. Hon. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General; U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC. DEAR ATTORNEY GENERAL HOLDER: I am writing about the Justice Department’s im- plementation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act--an act
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012720 →ne 6, 2011. Hon. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General; U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC. DEAR ATTORNEY GENERAL HOLDER: I am writing about the Justice Department’s im- plementation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act--an act that I co-sponsored in 2004. These questions relate to an Office of Legal Counsel (“OLC’’?)
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012720 →ess could not have been clearer in its direction that using ‘“‘best efforts’’ to en- force the CVRA was an obligation of “Colfficers and employees of the Department of Justice and other departments and agen- cies of the United States engaged in the de- tection, investigation, or prosecution of crime . .? 18 U.S.C. §8771(c)
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012720 →nted to without fear of prosecution. But, according to several former DOf lawyers, Rosenstein in this circumstance may have the power to override the Office of Legal Counsel opinion. In effect, finding that the standing opinion does not cover the present circumstances. In one view-and in the suspicion of some in th
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030251 →iation, caused his dismissal and the loss of his pension. The Mueller team may have a high hurdle in convincing Rosenstein to approve the indictment. The Department of Justice's standing view precludes charging a sitting president with a crime. This is based on an opinion written by the Office of Legal Counsel in the Watergat
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030251 →v. United States, 817 F.Supp.2d 1337, 1341 (S.D. Fla. 2011). Epstein also fails to fully describe what the Justice Department regulations required the Justice Department to do during the investigative stage of a case. The 2005 Attorney General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance (hereinafter "2005 A.G. Victi
Page: EFTA00021457 →ions to provide Epstein's victims with more information about what was happening. Epstein also refers to a 2010 opinion of the Justice Department's Office of Legal (OLC), which concluded that the CVRA did not extend rights until the filing of formal charges. Epstein Remedies Br. at 32. Of course, the OLC opini
Page: EFTA00021458 →1(b)(1) (emphasis added). This Court also previously held that "[w]hile Epstein was within his rights to attempt to persuade higher authorities with the Department of Justice to overrule the prosecutorial decisions of the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, the CVRA was designed to give victims the
Page: EFTA00021469 →v. United States, 817 F.Supp.2d 1337, 1341 (S.D. Fla. 2011). Epstein also fails to fully describe what the Justice Department regulations required the Justice Department to do during the investigative stage of a case. The 2005 Attorney General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance (hereinafter "2005 A.G. Victi
Page: EFTA00022561 →ions to provide Epstein's victims with more information about what was happening. Epstein also refers to a 2010 opinion of the Justice Department's Office of Legal (OLC), which concluded that the CVRA did not extend rights until the filing of formal charges. Epstein Remedies Br. at 32. Of course, the OLC opini
Page: EFTA00022562 →1(b)(1) (emphasis added). This Court also previously held that "[w]hile Epstein was within his rights to attempt to persuade higher authorities with the Department of Justice to overrule the prosecutorial decisions of the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, the CVRA was designed to give victims the
Page: EFTA00022573 →Entities connected to both Office of Legal and Department of Justice

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Michael Cohen
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION
Jeffrey Sloman
PERSON
Hunter Biden
PERSON
New Hampshire
LOCATIONGarcia
PERSON
the University of Utah
ORGANIZATION
Madison
LOCATIONthe Eleventh Circuit
ORGANIZATIONDistrict Court for the Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATIONGuzman
PERSON