Epstein Secrets

ppropriate. Eighth, it is both unreasonable and unjustifiable to hold Mr. Epstein responsible—never mind declare him in breach—with regard to Judge McSorley's nunc pro tune order. Exhibit 1, June 15, 2009 Letter at 3. Neither Mr. Epstein nor defense counsel had anything to do with and certainly no prior

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND AffILIATED PAItTNERSHIPS Lefko..vitz. P C TojCall Write, Dimctly: www.kIrkland.com June 19, 2009 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Flor

s Office about legal repercussions if he was not admitted to the program. I also discovered—again, not from Mr. Epstein or his attorneys—that Judge McSorley had modified Mr. Epstein's judgment motc pro tune to an "Order of Community Control I," which directly contradicted the terms of the Non- Prosecutio

is plea for another few weeks, time is clearly not of the essence regarding any notification to the identified individuals. Sincerely, ilyjti a . Lefko 'tz EFTA00234589 Exhibit 4 EFTA00234590 12/04/07 TUE 16:46 FAX 305 530 6440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorn

s Office about legal repercussions if he was not admitted to the program. I also discovered—again, not from Mr. Epstein or his attorneys—that Judge McSorley had modified Mr. Epstein's judgment motc pro tune to an "Order of Community Control I," which directly contradicted the terms of the Non- Prosecutio

is plea for another few weeks, time is clearly not of the essence regarding any notification to the identified individuals. Sincerely, ilyjti a . Lefko 'tz EFTA00213067 Exhibit 4 EFTA00213068 12/04/07 TUE 16:46 FAX 305 530 6440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorn