Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ppropriate. Eighth, it is both unreasonable and unjustifiable to hold Mr. Epstein responsible—never mind declare him in breach—with regard to Judge McSorley's nunc pro tune order. Exhibit 1, June 15, 2009 Letter at 3. Neither Mr. Epstein nor defense counsel had anything to do with and certainly no prior
several objections to the suggested modification in my letter to Mr. Acosta, dated December 21, 2007. See Exhibit 21, December 21, 2007 Letter from J. Leficowitz to U.S. Attorney Acosta. I personally became aware of the inclusion of that language on Wednesday, August 13, 2008 and discussed the matter with yo
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ppropriate. Eighth, it is both unreasonable and unjustifiable to hold Mr. Epstein responsible—never mind declare him in breach—with regard to Judge McSorley's nunc pro tune order. Exhibit 1, June 15, 2009 Letter at 3. Neither Mr. Epstein nor defense counsel had anything to do with and certainly no prior
several objections to the suggested modification in my letter to Mr. Acosta, dated December 21, 2007. See Exhibit 21, December 21, 2007 Letter from J. Leficowitz to U.S. Attorney Acosta. I personally became aware of the inclusion of that language on Wednesday, August 13, 2008 and discussed the matter with yo
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ppropriate. Eighth, it is both unreasonable and unjustifiable to hold Mr. Epstein responsible—never mind declare him in breach—with regard to Judge McSorley's nunc pro tune order. Exhibit 1, June 15, 2009 Letter at 3. Neither Mr. Epstein nor defense counsel had anything to do with and certainly no prior
several objections to the suggested modification in my letter to Mr. Acosta, dated December 21, 2007. See Exhibit 21, December 21, 2007 Letter from J. Leficowitz to U.S. Attorney Acosta. I personally became aware of the inclusion of that language on Wednesday, August 13, 2008 and discussed the matter with yo
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ppropriate. Eighth, it is both unreasonable and unjustifiable to hold Mr. Epstein responsible—never mind declare him in breach—with regard to Judge McSorley's nunc pro tune order. Exhibit 1, June 15, 2009 Letter at 3. Neither Mr. Epstein nor defense counsel had anything to do with and certainly no prior
ovisions of the NPA. We informed the USAO of this request the very next day in a letter to Mr. Acosta. See Exhibit 3, November 29, 2007 Letter from J. Leficowitz to U.S. Attorney Acosta at 4. • In a December 4, 2007 letter, Mr. Acosta stated that he supported the defense's appeal to Washington. See Exhibit
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (54)
Entities connected to both Sandra K. McSorley and J. Leficowitz
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON176 w/ Sandra·6 w/ J.
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION121 w/ Sandra·6 w/ J.
Alexander Acosta
PERSON120 w/ Sandra·6 w/ J.
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON115 w/ Sandra·5 w/ J.
RJ
Robert C. Josefsberg
PERSON82 w/ Sandra·3 w/ J.
LB
Leon Black
PERSON77 w/ Sandra·6 w/ J.
Podhurst
PERSON75 w/ Sandra·4 w/ J.
Southern District
LOCATION73 w/ Sandra·4 w/ J.
United States
LOCATION70 w/ Sandra·6 w/ J.
RB
Roy Black
PERSON67 w/ Sandra·6 w/ J.
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON60 w/ Sandra·6 w/ J.
the Southern District
LOCATION62 w/ Sandra·2 w/ J.
Kenneth Marra
PERSON45 w/ Sandra·5 w/ J.
PU
Pucillo
PERSON43 w/ Sandra·4 w/ J.
Ken Starr
PERSON42 w/ Sandra·5 w/ J.
A. Marie Villafana
PERSON43 w/ Sandra·3 w/ J.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON36 w/ Sandra·6 w/ J.
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
ORGANIZATION39 w/ Sandra·3 w/ J.
Jeffrey Sloman
PERSON38 w/ Sandra·3 w/ J.
Citigroup Center
ORGANIZATION36 w/ Sandra·3 w/ J.