Epstein Secrets

with the state court, T really think this is walking too close to a 6(e) violation, and since the state judges up here don't like us too much, Judge McSorley would probably order it unsealed which would cause huge problems, both in terms of Rule 6(e) and because the public reaction will be — if the US had

t: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 2:53 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Subject: Questions 1. Can we file the proposed indictment under seal with the State Court judge? The agreement states that the parties anticipate that this agreement will no be made part of any public record. 2. Was your suggestion to pr

with the state court, I really think this is walking too close to a 6(e) violation, and since the state judges up here don't like us too much, Judge McSorley would probably order it unsealed which would cause huge problems, both in terms of Rule 6(e) and because the public reaction will be — if the US had

t: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 2:53 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Subject: Questions 1. Can we file the proposed indictment under seal with the State Court judge? The agreement states that the parties anticipate that this agreement will not be made part of any public record. 2. Was your suggestion to p

al with the state court, I really think this is walking too close to a 61 violation, and since the state judges up hem don't like us too-much, Judge McSorley would probably order it unsealed which would cause huge problems, both in terms of Rule 61 and because the public reaction will be — if the US had t

.5. Att rne From: (USAFLS) Sen sd ne 25, 2008 2:53 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Questions 1. Can we file the proposed indictment under seal with the State Court judge? The agreement states that the parties anticipate that this agreement will not be made part of any public record. 2. Was your suggestion to p