Epstein Secrets

FICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing was served on July 28, 2008 by U.S. mail on all counsel named on the service list. Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boul,~vard, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160

District Court for the Northern District of Florida confirmed this position and specifically rejected the plaintiffs' contrary argument. See Doe v. Francis, No. 5:03 CV 260, 2005 WL 950623, at *2 (N.D. Fla. 2005). The plaintiffs there argued that "the stay should be lifted due to the fact that the mino

Rule 7.1.A.3, and all other relief this Court deems just and appropriate. Dated: July 18, 2008. Respectfully submitted, By: s/ Jeffrey M. Herman ______ . Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No. 521647) [email protected] Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) [email protected]

abuse. This argument is unsupported by the statute or its underlying policies. The unpublished, trial court decisions cited by Defendant of Doe v. Francis, 2005 WL 517487 (N.D. Fla. Apr. 20, 2005) (Francis I) and Doe v. Francis, 2005 WL 950623 (N.D. Fla. Apr. 20, 2005) (Francis II) are readily disting

rd identified below by facsimile and U.S. Mail. Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horow

05 WL 517847, at *1-2 (N.D. Fla. Feb. 10, 2005) (Francis I) (staying federal civil action in favor of "a cri