Epstein Secrets

ible claim that we breached the NPA by raising those concerns with you. EFTA00731108 Ms. A. Marie Villafana, Esq. June 16, 2009 Page 5 Once Mr. Podhurst was selected, Mr. Epstein and the defense team made every effort to retain Mr. Podhurst as soon as possible. Moreover, as you have acknowledged, the

osed victim notification letter indicating that the alleged victims had a federal right to be notified of the resolution of this matter pursuant to the Crime Victims' Rights under § 3771. See November 28, 2007 Draft Victim Notification Letter from Villafana. We promptly objected to the draft letter, and our dialogue regarding notifi

er to Judge Davis (authored by then FAUSA Sloman) dated October 25, 2007 followed. See Exhibit 17, October 25, 2007 Letter to Judge Davis. Once Mr. Podhurst's firm was selected by Judge Davis, Mr. Epstein did not object to the selection. Moreover, as you have acknowledged to the court, the open issues in

osed victim notification letter indicating that the alleged victims had a federal right to be notified of the resolution of this matter pursuant to the Crime Victims' Rights under § 3771. See Exhibit 14, November 29, 2007 Draft Victim Notification Letter from Assistant U.S. Attorneya Mr. Epstein's counsel objected to your draft let

l law. A letter to Judge (authored by then FAUaalloman) dated October 25, 2007 followed. See Exhibit 17, Octo 25, 2007 Letter to Judge . Once Mr. Podhurst's firm was selected by Judge M, Mr. Epstein did not object to the selection. Moreover, as you have acknowledged to the court, the open issues involv

osed victim notification letter indicating that the alleged victims had a federal right to be notified of the resolution of this matter pursuant to the Crime Victims' Rights under § 3771. See Exhibit 14, November 29, 2007 Draft Victim Notification Letter from Assistant U.S. Attorney Villafana. Mr. Epstein's counsel objected to your

law. A letter to Judge Davis (authored by then dated October 25, 2007 followed. See Exhibit 17, October 25, 2007 Letter to Judge Davis. Once Mr. Podhurst's firm was selected by Judge Davis, Mr. Epstein did not object to the selection. Moreover, as you have acknowledged to the court, the open issues in

osed victim notification letter indicating that the alleged victims had a federal right to be notified of the resolution of this matter pursuant to the Crime Victims' Rights under § 3771. See Exhibit 14, November 29, 2007 Draft Victim Notification Letter from Assistant U.S. Attorney . Mr. Epstein's counsel objected to your draft le

law. A letter to Judge (authored by then FAUSA Sloman) dated October 25, 2007 followed. See Exhibit 17, October 25, 2007 Letter to Judge Once Mr. Podhurst's firm was selected by Judge M, Mr. Epstein did not object to the selection. Moreover, as you have acknowledged to the court, the open issues involv

osed victim notification letter indicating that the alleged victims had a federal right to be notified of the resolution of this matter pursuant to the Crime Victims' Rights under § 3771. See Exhibit 14, November 29, 2007 Draft Victim Notification Letter from Assistant U.S. Attorney Villafana. Mr. Epstein's counsel objected to your

law. A letter to Judge (authored by then FAUSA Sloman) dated October 25, 2007 followed. See Exhibit 17, October 25, 2007 Letter to Judge Once Mr. Podhurst's firm was selected by Judge M, Mr. Epstein did not object to the selection. Moreover, as you have acknowledged to the court, the open issues involv

osed victim notification letter indicating that the alleged victims had a federal right to be notified of the resolution of this matter pursuant to the Crime Victims' Rights under § 3771. See Exhibit 14, November 29, 2007 Draft Victim Notification Letter from Assistant U.S. Attorney Mr. Epstein's counsel objected to your draft lett