Epstein Secrets

er to Judge Davis (authored by then FAUSA Sloman) dated October 25, 2007 followed. See Exhibit 17, October 25, 2007 Letter to Judge Davis. Once Mr. Podhurst's firm was selected by Judge Davis, Mr. Epstein did not object to the selection. Moreover, as you have acknowledged to the court, the open issues in

ee related issues that the Podhurst firm and Mr. Epstein's civil counsel cannot resolve. See Exhibit 20, June 15, 2009 Letter from Robert Critton to Kathy Ezell. There is nothing about the exchanges between counsel and the USAO regarding the attorney representative that even begins to approach a "willful" b

l law. A letter to Judge (authored by then FAUaalloman) dated October 25, 2007 followed. See Exhibit 17, Octo 25, 2007 Letter to Judge . Once Mr. Podhurst's firm was selected by Judge M, Mr. Epstein did not object to the selection. Moreover, as you have acknowledged to the court, the open issues involv

ee related issues that the Podhurst firm and Mr. Epstein's civil counsel cannot resolve. See Exhibit 20, June 15, 2009 Letter from Robert Critton to Kathy Ezell. There is nothing about the exchanges between counsel and the USAO regarding the attorney representative that even begins to approach a "willful" b

law. A letter to Judge (authored by then FAUSA Sloman) dated October 25, 2007 followed. See Exhibit 17, October 25, 2007 Letter to Judge Once Mr. Podhurst's firm was selected by Judge M, Mr. Epstein did not object to the selection. Moreover, as you have acknowledged to the court, the open issues involv

effiey Epstein I am attaching a letter authored by my co-counsel, Robert Critton, on today's date. It represents our agreement with a proposal that Kathy Ezell indicated in a letter dated June 8, 2009 would be fully acceptable to her and Bob Josefsberg as a means to resolve expeditiously all outstanding fe

law. A letter to Judge (authored by then FAUSA Sloman) dated October 25, 2007 followed. See Exhibit 17, October 25, 2007 Letter to Judge Once Mr. Podhurst's firm was selected by Judge M, Mr. Epstein did not object to the selection. Moreover, as you have acknowledged to the court, the open issues involv

pstein Dear a I am attaching a letter authored by my co-counsel, Robert Critton, on today's date. It represents our agreement with a proposal that Kathy Ezell indicated in a letter dated June 8, 2009 would be fully acceptable to her and Bob Josefsberg as a means to resolve expeditiously all outstanding fe

akes no position as to the validity of any such claim units statute," should be included in any proposed letter. Sixth, your letter states that Mr. Podhurst and Mr. Josefsberg may "represent" the identified individuals. Since we have not yet had the opportunity to speak with Mr. Podhurst or Mr. Josefsbe

J. BENAVENTE PARALIOAL/M55113.700. BARBARA M. McYJNNA ASHUB SIDKEN•BARMO BETTY STOKES PAPALZO&L1 RITA H. BUDNTIC Or COUPRIA On June 8, 2009, Kathy Ezell wrote a letter to me regarding outstanding fee payment issues. At page 3, she stated that she was not adverse to an earlier proposal that had been

our Agreement, I will prepare an Amended Notification that contains the names of additional identified victims. As you know, Judge had selected the Podhurst firm to serve as the attorney representative for the victims. Assuming that Mr. Josefsberg is still amenable to the appointment, we will provide hi

in Facsimile: I am attaching a letter authored by my co-counsel, Robert Critton, on today's date. It represents our agreement with a proposal that Kathy Ezell indicated in a letter dated June 8, 2009 would be fully acceptable to her and Bob Josefsberg as a means to resolve expeditiously all outstanding fe

no position as to the validity of any such claim under this statute," should be included in any proposed letter. Sixth, your letter states that Mr. Podhurst and Mr. Josefsberg may "represent" the identified individuals. Since we have not yet had the opportunity to speak with Mr. Podhurst or Mr. Josefsbe

J. BENAVENTE PARALIOAL/M55113.700. BARBARA M. McYJNNA ASHUB SIDKEN•BARMO BETTY STOKES PAPALZO&L1 RITA H. BUDNTIC Or COUPRIA On June 8, 2009, Kathy Ezell wrote a letter to me regarding outstanding fee payment issues. At page 3, she stated that she was not adverse to an earlier proposal that had been

greement, I will prepare an Amended Notification that contains the names of additional identified victims. As you know, Judge Davis had selected the Podhurst firm to serve as the attorney representative for the victims. Assuming that Mr. Josefsberg is still amenable to the appointment, we will provide hi

e: Facsimile: I am attaching a letter authored by my co-counsel, Robert Critton, on today's date. It represents our agreement with a proposal that Kathy Ezell indicated in a letter dated June 8, 2009 would be fully acceptable to her and Bob Josefsberg as a means to resolve expeditiously all outstanding fe