I I. BBNAVENITI PARAL60AiiINYBITKIMOR BARBARA M. McKENNA ASHUR STOKENNARINO BETTY STOKES PARA, Wadi RITA N. BUDNYK OP COUNPA. On June 8, 2009, Kathy Ezell wrote a letter to me regarding outstanding fee payment issues. At page 3, she stated that she was not adverse to an earlier proposal that had been

in Facsimile: I am attaching a letter authored by my co-counsel, Robert Critton, on today's date. It represents our agreement with a proposal that Kathy Ezell indicated in a letter dated June 8, 2009 would be fully acceptable to her and Bob Josefsberg as a means to resolve expeditiously all outstanding fe

ee related issues that the Podhurst firm and Mr. Epstein's civil counsel cannot resolve. See Exhibit 20, June 15, 2009 Letter from Robert Critton to Kathy Ezell. There is nothing about the exchanges between counsel and the USAO regarding the attorney representative that even begins to approach a "willful" b

Josefsberg, causing them great distress." I conferred with Mr. Josefsberg's firm. Mr. Josefsberg himself has not contacted any victim. His partner, Kathy Ezell, attempted to contact three victims before receiving Mr. Mermelstein's notification of representation. Ms. Ezell spoke directly only to one victim,

Josefsberg, causing them great distress." I conferred with Mr. Josefsberg's firm. Mr. Josefsberg himself has not contacted any victim. His partner, Kathy Ezell, attempted to contact three victims before receiving Mr. Mermelstein's notification of representation. Ms. Ezell spoke directly only to one victim,

Josefsberg, causing them great distress." I conferred with Mr. Josefsberg's firm. Mr. Josefsberg himself has not contacted any victim. His partner, Kathy Ezell, attempted to contact three victims before receiving Mr. Mermelstein's notification of representation. Ms. Ezell spoke directly only to one victim,

Josefsberg, causing them great distress." I conferred with Mr. Josefsberg's firm. Mr. Josefsberg himself has not contacted any victim. His partner, Kathy Ezell, attempted to contact three victims before receiving Mr. Mermelstein's notification of representation. Ms. Ezell spoke directly only to one victim,

ee related issues that the Podhurst firm and Mr. Epstein's civil counsel cannot resolve. See Exhibit 20, June 15, 2009 Letter from Robert Critton to Kathy Ezell. There is nothing about the exchanges between counsel and the USAO regarding the attorney representative that even begins to approach a "willful" b

in Facsimile: I am attaching a letter authored by my co-counsel, Robert Critton, on today's date. It represents our agreement with a proposal that Kathy Ezell indicated in a letter dated June 8, 2009 would be fully acceptable to her and Bob Josefsberg as a means to resolve expeditiously all outstanding fe

Raab meant. CCOM.TFIALIAWYEa BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN LLP A LRAM LIABILITY TaTtetnet Sent by E-mail Only - Robert Josefsberg, Esq. Kathy Ezell, Esq. Re: Epstein Matter August 18, 2009 ADER.QUI I. IIEWAYENTE TAIMURIAL I RWRIMMTOR EARWAX maENNA AMIE STOICEN4Mftwo BETTYSTC4033 FADALLOA

is, his or her qualifications, etc. I shall look forward to your response. Cordially yours, v24.64_7 6 Cc Robert D. Critton, Jr. ( RDC/clz cc. Kathy Ezell, Esq. EFTA00723303

nfirm our call to your office cancelling the mediation scheduled on January 6, 2010. The case has settled. Cordially y Robert I Critton, Jr. cc: Kathy Ezell, Esq. 303 BANYAN BOULEVARD • SUITE 400 • WEST PALM BEACH. FL 33401 • PHON • FAX: 561-844-6929 • EFTA00723295

1750 LD 0.85 05/14/09 Telephone Charges N 217 001751 LD 2 1.21 06/02/09 Conference Expense: C050054(Ezell/West Palm/5-09 A 107961 006150 CE Kathy Ezell 19.18 0.78 07/23/09 Telephone Charges N 203 CO0199 LD 2 08114/09 Cost Reimbursement: Costs reduced from fee paid thru 312509 A 005874 CREM

and respond to messages. 0.20 10/14/2009 DT Review e-mails regarding scheduling of deposition of client. 0.10 10/16/2009 WLR Telephone call to Kathy Ezell and left message. 0.30 Telephone conference with Kathy Ezell. Review and respond to messages. 10/19/2009 WLR Review and respond to messages. 0.2

22 23 24 25 make the record clear you spoke to Ms. O'Connor, correct, at the beginning of today? MR. KUVIN: It was actually a discussion with Kathy Ezell as to whether or not they would get to her, and that's where the discussion went MR. PIKE: I just want to make sure that discussion wasn't with m

ts reduced from fee paid emu 3/25/09 A CO5671 CREM -5,755.75 10/05/09 Conference Expense: C.Ft8279-K.EzelULake Worth/9-3-09 A 109098 CR8513 CE Kathy Ezell 5.52 10/14/09 Westlaw Legal Research September 2009 N CS1060 LR 8.12 Amount Mod - Expenses Advance vs. Non-Cash Summary Advanced expenses

63 09/23/09 Westlaw Legal Research August 2009 N CR6033 LR 96.77 09/25/09 Miscellaneous - Client CR6914-K.Ezeenfelephone A 109035 CR6992 MSC Kathy Ezell 56.96 09/30/09 Telephone Charge.. N 203 CR8032 LD 21 29.19 09/30/09 Telephone Charge N 203 CR8035 LD 2 2.16 09/30/09 Telephone Charcoal

3 LD 2 1.21 05119/09 Photostats N 2214 002914 COPY 15 3.00 06/02/09 Conference Expense: C05005-K.Ezell/VVest Palm/5-09 A 107981 006147 CE Kathy Ezell 19.18 07/08/09 Telephone Charges4SW N 203 CP6206 LD 3 1.77 07/23/09 Telephone Charges N 203 000194 LD 1 0.78 08/14/09 Cost Reimburseme

LD 5 6.95 05/29/09 Photostats N 5122 C05693 COPY 1 0.20 07/16/09 Conference Expense: CP7262-KEzell/Client Mtg./-24-09 A 108377 CP7423 CE Kathy Ezell 29.38 08/14/09 Cost Reimbursement Costs reduced from lee paid Ihru 3/25/09 A 005865 CREM 409.32 OW15/09 Telephone Charges N 203 CR3843 Lb

12.54 09/25/09 Telephone Charges a N 210 CR7440 LD 3 4.17 10/05/09 Travel Expense: CR8279.K.Ezed/West Palm BeactV9-24-09 A 109098 CR8510 TR Kathy Ezell 50.34 EFTA00601014 Pre-Billing Report Page 3 11/1012009 3:56:41 PM Client 5502 - Kirkland & Ellis. LLP Matter 11509 - Epstein, Jeffrey rel.