Epstein Secrets

he federal statutes would be applicable to Mr. Epstein's conduct, a lay person cannot be expected to make that determination. As confirmed by Judge Stern's conclusions regarding the application of § 2422(b), as well as the other relevant federal statutes, the conduct at issue is clearly not within the

of differing constructions,' due process requires a strict construction of the language in the defendant's favor under the rule of lenity") (citing F. Stat. § 6 As we have made clear throughout this investigation, the alleged conduct does not implicate over-arching federal interests because the conduc

of § 2422(b), as well as the other relevant federal statutes, the conduct at imam is clearly not within the predictable scope of jt 2422. See Judge Stern's Letter ("In sum. whatever sexual contact occurred. occurred face to lace. without the use of an instrumentality of interstate commerce to persuad

of differing constructions.' due process requires a strict construction of the language in the defendant's favor under the rule of lenity") (citing F. Stat. 775.021(1) (1995); Perkins v. State. 576 80.2d 1310. 1312 (Fla. 1991): Logan v. State, 666 So.2d 260.261 (Flu. 4th DCA 1996)). • Plain Meatninzt

n of F 2422(b), as well as the other relevant federal statutes, the conduct at issue is clearly not within the predictable scope of 2422. See Judge Stern's 1.etter ("In stun. whatever sexual contact occurred, occurred face to face. without the use of an instrumentality of interstate commerce to persu

of differing constructions.' due pn'ccss requires a strict construction of the language in the defendant's favor under the rule of lenity") (riling F. Stat. 775.021( I ) (1995): Perkins it State, 576 So.2d 1310. 1312 (Fla. 1991): Logan it State, 666 So.2d 260. 261 (Fla. 4th ocA 1996)). • Plain Meaning