Epstein Secrets

Judge from l3 I Original 0 2 Removed from 0 3 Re-filed- 0 4 Reinstatod or 0 5 another dinner 06 Multidistnet 0 ' Magistrate Proceeding State Court (see VI below) Reopened (sPerifY) Litigation Judgment VI. RELATED/RE-FILED CASE(S). (See wine DOM second page): a) Re-filed Case 0 YES 4D N

ATLL3N 462 Naturalisation O Application EI 463 Habeas Corpus•Alien Detainee 40 Other In Wain O Miami V. ORIGIN lame • - 4(' in One Box Only) Appal to District Trans erred from 7 Judge from l3 I Original 0 2 Removed from 0 3 Re-filed- 0 4 Reinstatod or 0 5 another dinner 06 Multidistne

CCONV? Goon, FLOOOM 33133 4 cot 40 EFTA00234071 • • Case 9:08-cv-80811-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 5 of 40 5. The State Court docket has been filed. All papers filed in the State Court are attached to this Removal Petition. Conclusion Because this is a civil action betwee

1 Il l Ariollegol Acts 1 593 00000 one Sighilluelies Aci 1 193 EavInsommial Menem 1 194 gamy Allocelloa Am -8 69) treidom of Memnon Aci 1 900 Appal oh mt m Dose esamo Jade Engel Acmes to !nun , 00 Coestimnsaolge of Sun Sumo PROP HOSTS 1 120 COPYrIlhis I ISO P tttt 1 940 Trammel LABOR

t several of the young girls that were victimized and abused by Jeffrey Epstein. While we are aware of his recent guilty plea and conviction in his State Court case, the sentence imposed in that case is grossly inadequate for a sexual predator of this magnitude. The information and evidence that has come to

ted Stouts of Properiy 21 USC III 3 630 Limior Laws 3 640 R.R. A Tenet 7 630 Airline Rea. 3 MO Uncopitiiamil Safely/1144M 3 690 Oita 1 422 Appal 211 USC 1511 74:3 Wklidemsal 25 USC 157 7 490 Sis e RappeeMneafill 7 III) Mavis/ 7 430 Br Ls so6 limiting 7 430 Commove 3 440 Dammam'. n 47