Epstein Secrets

seq., on behalf of themselves and the entire nationwide class. On April 17, 2014, Richard Kahn filed a putative class action against defendants in the United States District Court for the For internal use only SDNY_GM_00057234 CONFIDENTIAL-PURSUANTTOFED.R.WhfiI E)EENTFIAL_ DB-SONY-0020058 EFTA_00 I 67802 EFTA01295899 Pa

: Sup. Ct. N.J. DISPOSITION: Application denied. OPINION r1036] ran ORDER IN A PENDING CASE ['1037] The application for stay addressed to Justice Scalia and referred to the Court is denied. Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of this application. MICHAEL WHALEN; RICHARD KAH

ILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL I2 ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-011801 EFTA00192847 Epstein will not contest the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his person and/or the subject matter, and Epstein waives his right to contest liability and also waives h

der the law that existed when the con uct took place has timeless and universal appeal." Kaiser Alum. & trt Corp . B mo 494 U.S. 827, 855 (1990) (Scalia, J., concurring). Id. at 265 (footnote omitted). Courts therefore apply the statute in effect at the time of the underlying conduct unless there is

, Defendant-Appellee. No. 07-10183 D.C. Docket No. 06-00009-CR-WS United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit (January 31, 2008) Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama Before MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges, and HANCOCK ", District Judge. s. Honorable James Hughes Hancock, U

y affect interstate commerce. See also United States I Ili 514 U.S. 549, 558-59, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 1 1 L. .2d 626 (1995); Reich, 125 S.Ct. at 2215 (Scalia, J., concurring) (noting that *1103 for over thirty years, "our cases have mechanically recited that the Commerce Clause permits congressional reg

296697325-L_801_0-1 6/10/2009 EFTA00175264 Case'9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 RIPON 1 105 0.1 ELECTRONIC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Mar. 24, 2009 STEVEN m.LARim0RE CLERK N.S. DIST. CT. s.o. Or FLA.• MIAMI 09-80469-Civ-RYSKAMPNITUNAC JANE DOE II

were possessed; the Court held the legislative amendment was a mere clarification of the prior legislation and not an ex post facto law. 9 Justice Scalia cited the statement of purpose of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, to hold that, for example, the amendments specifically designed to overrule Patterso

Donald FELL, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 06-2882-cr. Argued: June 27, 2007. Decided: June 27, 2008. Background: Defendant was convicted in the United States District Court for the Dis- trict of Vermont, William K. Sessions III, Chief Judge, of murder in course of car- jacking and kidnapping, and he was sen- tenced to d

s should be proven to a jury in the same manner as the other elements of the crint Writing•for the majority in Sattazahn . Pennsylvania, Justice Scalia explained at before Ring, "capital-sentencing proceedings were un- derstood to be just that: sentencing pro- ceedings. " 537 U.S. 101, 110, 123 S.C