Epstein Secrets

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-3) Jan 07, 2010 FILED CLERK'S OFFICE MDL No. 1963 On August 18, 2008, the Panel transferred one civil action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 572 F.Supp.2d 1377 (J.

ill be made available on the Panel's public website. This is an interim measure while the Panel, in conjunction with the Administrative Office ofthe United States Courts, develops a case management/electronic case Sling (CM/ECF) system that will include PACER access to Panel docket sheets and other information. The

ended murder, conspiracy, and other complex federal and state felony indictments (1976-present) Panel member, Federal Criminal Justice Act Panel in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (1985-1992) Panel member, Homicide, Felony, and Appellate panels, First Department, New York State Supreme C

ty (January 22, 2007)(deposition) New York State Assembly Codes Committee, Hearing on New York State's Death Penalty (January 21, 2005)(testimony) U. S. Congress, House Committee on Government Reform (February 25, 2002) (Amendment to 18 U.S.C. §I503)(testimony) 15 EFTA00073182 U.S. Congress, House Judicia

. Govt. Works. Page 24 of 24 Page 24 https://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?utid=%7bFEDF5709-3AEA-4F74-8619-... 4/10/2008 EFTA00191723 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No: D 18 U.S.C. § 371 18 U.S.C. § 1591(a)(1) 18 U.S.C. § 1591(a)(2) 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) 18 U.S.C. § 2423(e)

n dismissals and even retrial will not necessarily result in convic- tion. FNS. Annual Report of the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Table B-1, p. 228 (1984). Denial of bail for the primary purpose of punishing the defendant is unreasonable, and therefore a violation of the ei

, Defendant-Appellee. No. 07-10183 D.C. Docket No. 06-00009-CR-WS United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit (January 31, 2008) Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama Before MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges, and HANCOCK ", District Judge. s. Honorable James Hughes Hancock, U

g, the Marshal of the Supreme Court; with respect to the Thur- good Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, the Director of the Administrative Office of United States Courts; and Copr. @ West 2008 No Claim to Orig. Govt. Works latps://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?prft=HTMLE&destination=atp&sv=Full... 2/27/200

uce, or entice minor females to engage in prostitution, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422(b); all in violation ofTitle 18, United States Code, Section 371; • (2) knowingly and willfully conspiring with others known and unknown to travel in interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging

the individuals referred to in paragraph (7), supra, elects to file suit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255, Epstein will not contest the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his person end/or the subject matter, and Epstein waives his right to contest liability and also waives h