Epstein Secrets

Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. https://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?sv=Full&prft=HTMLE&fn=_top&mt=Fe... 3/6/2008 EFTA00192218 FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION 05 AUG 3I PM 2: I? UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CASE NO. 2:S05-cr-34-FtM-29SPC 18 USC §2251(cX2

06-3262. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 10, 2007. Filed: July 30, 2007. Background: Defendant was convicted in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, Gary A. Fen- ner, J., of seven counts of violating federal child exploitation statutes, and was sen- tenced t

y, and codefendant Kimberly Bull. Late in December of 1990, Scott, Frey, Bull, DeBolt, and Tinsley left Toledo in Scott's auto- mobile destined for Memphis, Tennessee. Maes, C 2008 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. https://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?sv=Full&prf1=HTMLE&fn=_t

Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 45(cX3XAXiii) quashing subpoenas ad testificanduni and duces twain served on than by plaintiff Jane Doe in an action pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida captioned Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, No. 08-cv-80893-1CAM, or in the alternative for a Protective Order pursuant

Heather G. Hacker, Alliance Page 1722 Defense Fund, Folsom, Calif., and Nathan W. Kellum and Jonathan Scruggs, of Alliance Defense Fund - Memphis, Memphis, Tenn., for plaintiffs. Martha H. McCampbell, Office of Knox County Law Director, Knoxville, Tenn.; and Gary M. Prince and P. Alexander Vogel, of O

Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 45(cX3XAXiii) quashing subpoenas ad testificanduni and duces twain served on than by plaintiff Jane Doe in an action pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida captioned Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, No. 08-cv-80893-1CAM, or in the alternative for a Protective Order pursuant

Heather G. Hacker, Alliance Page 1722 Defense Fund, Folsom, Calif., and Nathan W. Kellum and Jonathan Scruggs, of Alliance Defense Fund - Memphis, Memphis, Tenn., for plaintiffs. Martha H. McCampbell, Office of Knox County Law Director, Knoxville, Tenn.; and Gary M. Prince and P. Alexander Vogel, of O

Page 2 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29508, * , et al., Plaintiffs, vs. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 07-2172-MI/P UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE, WESTERN DIVISION 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29508 April 6, 2009, Decided April 6, 2009, Filed PRIOR HISTORY:

information, vice principals, unreasonably dangerous, alternative design, research and development COUNSEL: rli Jimmy Moore, Miscellaneous, Pro se, Memphis, TN. For Ma Individually and by Next F " es M. Caroline by Next Frjgaljazies M. Mary Taylo y Next Friend James M. James M. Plaintiffs: C. Ta

of California, Appel. ken. Mime. Nos. 895, 596. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Nov. 5, 1958. Accused, who had been indicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan for alleged- t mailing circulars in violation of the o.ne Mail Statute, and who had been arrested on the indi

Grinalds, Asst. U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Jackson, TN, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Bruce I. Griffey, Office of Bruce Irwin Griffey, Memphis, TN, for Defendant-Appellant. Before: MOORE, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges; and FORESTER, District Judge.FNI FN1 . The Honorable Karl S. Forester, C