Epstein Secrets

cheme. EFTA00596503 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which

arly described as: Lauderdale Shores Rcamcm Plat 15-31 B Lot 22 Blk 5 with a Folio Number of 5042 12 13 0380; (RP10)10630 NW 14th Street, Apt. 110, Plantation, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant RP I 0," includes that portion of the condominiumitownhome, improvements, fixtures, attachments

cheme. EFTA00729418 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which

arly described as: Lauderdale Shores Reamem Plat 15-31 B Lot 22 Blk 5 with a Folio Number of 5042 12 13 0380; (RP10)10630 NW 141h Street, Apt. 110, Plantation, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant RP 10," includes that portion of the condominiumftownhome, improvements, fixtures, attachments a

cheme. EFTA00795602 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which

e particularly described as: Lauderdale Shores Reamem Plat Lot 22 Blk 5 with a Folio Number of 5042 12 13 0380; (RP10)10630 ? le Street, Apt. 110, Plantation, Florida, hereafter also referred to as T or ' fend t RHO," includes that portion of the condominium/townhome, vements, fixtures, attachments and

ne Doe. EFTA00193786 Epstein'. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which

icularly described as: Lauderdale Shores Reamem Nat 15-31 B Lot 22 Blk 5 with a Folio Number of 5042 12 13 0380; (RP10)10630 NW le Street, Apt 110, Plantation, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant RP10," includes that portion of the condominiumltownhome, improvements, fixtures, attachments an

S was recruited and joined RRA in the spring of 2009, the tone and tenor of rhetoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing the court on various motions from being substantive on the facts pled to ridiculously inflammatory and sound-bi

larly described as: Lauderdale Shores Reamem Plat 15-31 B Lot 2213Ik 5 with a Folio Number of 5042 12 13 0380; (RP10)10630 NW 14°' Street, Apt 110, Plantation, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant RPI0," includes that portion of the condominiumhownhome, improvements, fixtures, attachments and