Epstein Secrets

29 EFTA00077572 Table of Authorities Cases Abdell v. City of New York, No. 05 CIV. 8453 KMK JCF, 2006 WL 2664313 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 14, 2006) 8 Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78 (1935) 24 Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) 11 Brown v. Maxwel, 929 F.3d 4 (2d Cir. 2019) 19, 20 Chemical Ban

ad Edwards, or Peter Skinner; and (2) did not interview anyone other than AUSA such as the other attendees of the meeting (Pottinger, Edwards, and Skinner), or any of the other AUSAs whom AUSA talked to about her contacts with attorneys. Most conspicuous, of course, is the government's failure to in

tor Kristi Noem at -11. Additional reporting on the story was provided by CNN (09/17, Fritze, Cole), Fox News (09/17, Tamasco), The Guardian (09/17, Berger), The Hill (09/17, Fortlnsky), MSNBC (09/17, Benen), NBC News (09/17, Dixon), Newsweek (09/17, Mordowanec), New York Times (09/17, Liptak), Telegra

omberg (09/17, Miller, Strohm), The Daily Beast (09/17, Fiallo), EFTA01660803 Forbes (09/17, Durkee), Fox News (09/17, Deppisch), HuffPost (09/17, Skinner), The Independent (09/17, Woodward), The Hill (09/17, Fields), MSNBC (09/17, Salam), Newsweek (09/17, Gooding, Whisnant), New York Post (09/17, Nels

ad Edwards, or Peter Skinner; and (2) did not interview anyone other than AUSA such as the other attendees of the meeting (Pottinger, Edwards, and Skinner), or any of the other AUSAs whom AUSA talked to about her contacts with attorneys. Most conspicuous, of course, is the government's failure to in

tor] is in a peculiar and very definite sense the servant of the law, the twofold aim of which is that guilt shall not escape or innocence suffer." Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78, 88 (1935). Moreover, "[i]n light of the prosecutor's public responsibilities, broad authority and discretion, the pr

01 --- PAGE BREAK --- Table of Authorities Cases Abdell v. City of New York, No. 05 CIV. 8453 KMK JCF, 2006 WL 2664313 (.=. Sept 14, 2006) 8 Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78 (1935) 24 Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) 11 Brown v. Marcel, 929 F.3d 4 (2d Cir. 2019) 19, 20 Chemical B

ad Edwards, or Peter Skinner; and (2) did not interview anyone other than AUSA such as the other attendees of the meeting (Pottinger, Edwards, and Skinner), or any of the other AUSAs whom AUSA talked to about her contacts with attorneys. Most conspicuous, of course, is the government's failure to in