Skinner appears in the Epstein documents primarily as a subject of legal proceedings and court cases, with multiple references to Skinner v. Oklahoma and litigation involving a Peter Skinner, rather than as a direct associate of Jeffrey Epstein.
The mentions are concentrated in legal and court documents, including references to the case Skinner v. Oklahoma and litigation involving Peter Skinner in connection with grand jury subpoenas related to Epstein associates. There are also academic and scientific citations (Skinner et al, 1990) that appear unrelated to the Epstein case. The pattern suggests Skinner is referenced in legal contexts rather than personal or social connections to Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013501 - HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013795
1985; Zimmerman and Rapp, 1991). The olefactory bulb demonstrated spatially uniform scaling dimensions that changed with event-related perturbation (Skinner et al, 1990). An iron-induced spiking focus in the rat hippocampus in vivo manifested the same decrease in D2 as it did in the kindled in vitro hippo
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013737 →HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014037 - HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014083
as a basis for identifying a “crime victim’ as defined in the CVRA, the class of victims with statutory rights may well be broader.””'°’ Paletz and Skinner similarly provide scant support for the Department’s position. In Skinner, a prison inmate attempted to bring a pro se civil suit against another inm
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014058 →HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016221 - HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016412
l idea was that actions that were rewarded would be repeated and those that were punished would not, until the desired behavior was achieved. Even in Skinner’s day, this simple process, repeated over and over, could lead to complex behavior. Computers are designed to perform simple operations over and over
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016375 →HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016804 - HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016995
l idea was that actions that were rewarded would be repeated and those that were punished would not, until the desired behavior was achieved. Even in Skinner’s day, this simple process, repeated over and over, could lead to complex behavior. Computers are designed to perform simple operations over and over
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016958 →HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017603 - HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017634
should not be afforded statutory protections. !°! Yet none of these cases - United States v. 10 104 Turner, !9? Searcy v. Paletz, !°3 or Searcy v. Skinner - provide strong support for OLC's position. Turner is a particularly 9 See 42 U.S.C. § 10607(c). % Td. § 10607(c)(3)(A). % Td. § 10607(c)(1)(A).
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017616 →HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017635 - HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017713
viduals who have not been convicted of a crime." Jn re W.R. Huff Asset Mgmt. Co., 409 F.3d 555, 564 (2d Cir. 2005) (emphasis added); accord Searcy v. Skinner, No. 6:06-1418-GRA-WMC, 2006 WL 1677177, at 2 (D.S.C. June 16, 2006). Like the constitutional amendment it was patterned on, the CVRA extends rights
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017708 →HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021247 - HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021398
g, “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” Sterilization rates under eugenic laws in the United States increased following this ruling until the Skinner v. Oklahoma case in 1942, after which point they declined. The practice of medicine expresses more than a straightforward social instinct for protec
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021388 →7433 Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 23:57:07 +0000 We'll review this and get back to you. Best, Peter On April 15, 2019 at 7:50:15 PM EDT, wrote: Mr. Skinner, In connection with the grand jury sub oena the "Subpoena") directed to Boies Schiller Flexner LLP ("BSF"), in connection with the case captioned
Page: EFTA00020697 →15, 2019 7:49 PM To: Peter Skinner Cc: Si rid McCawlev Sandra Perkins Subject: RE: legal process, regarding In re v. Maxwell, 15 Civ. 7433 Mr. Skinner, In connection with the rand iury subpoena (the "Subpoena") directed to Boies Schiller Flexner LLP ("BSF"), in connection with the case captioned
Page: EFTA00020699 →ad Edwards, or Peter Skinner; and (2) did not interview anyone other than AUSA such as the other attendees of the meeting (Pottinger, Edwards, and Skinner), or any of the other AUSAs whom AUSA talked to about her contacts with attorneys. Most conspicuous, of course, is the government's failure to in
Page: EFTA00028941 →ad Edwards, or Peter Skinner; and (2) did not interview anyone other than AUSA such as the other attendees of the meeting (Pottinger, Edwards, and Skinner), or any of the other AUSAs whom AUSA talked to about her contacts with attorneys. Most conspicuous, of course, is the government's failure to in
Page: EFTA00029112 →District Court for the Southern District of New York
Organization
Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)
Jane Doe
Person2001 album by Converge

Ghislaine Maxwell
PersonBritish socialite and sex trafficker, daughter of Robert Maxwell, accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein

Harvey Weinstein
PersonAmerican film producer and sex offender (born 1952)

Eric Schmidt
PersonSoftware engineer, businessman, former Google CEO

Department of Justice
OrganizationSecond Circuit
OrganizationMaria Farmer
PersonAmerican visual artist
Criminal Division
Organization
E.O. Wilson
PersonAmerican biologist, naturalist, and writer (1929–2021)

George Mitchell
PersonAmerican politician, diplomat, and judge (born 1933)

Philadelphia
Location1993 film by Jonathan Demme

Stephen Hawking
PersonBritish theoretical physicist, cosmologist and author (1942–2018)
Doug Band
PersonAmerican presidential advisor

Cheng
PersonChinese family name (鄭 / 郑)

Earth
LocationThird planet from the Sun in the Solar System

United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America

Chris Christie
Person55th Governor of New Jersey and former U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey

Brady
PersonCity in and county seat of McCulloch County, Texas, United States