Epstein Secrets

isa re: povider records; finalize letter to Mamie!stein; finalize Motion to separate Does 2 through 7 as not consolidated: fax letter and motion to Mermelstein: go through task list with MJP; conference with JMB; pull and copy several documents for JMB; pull letters from RDC stacks to copy for EW case; pre

with legal assistant regarding filing of Federal Court Motions to 0.25 hr $75.00 Compel and Exhibits 04/02/2009 RHB Review correspondence from Mermelstein (JD Nos. 2-7) regarding tax returns 0.10 hr $30.00 04/02/2009 RHB Review Plaintiffs Response to Motion to Quash based on 5th Amendment (E.W.) 0

Dismiss, finalize case law and research cases excluding personal injury damages under RICO 4.20 hr $1,260.00 04/01/2009 BM Receipt of fax from Garcia on new filing of Doe II; prepare letter to Garcia; fax; call to Garcia's office; online search of Pacer; print Complaint, Subpoenas. two 5.75hr $7

oint Notice of Withdrawal as to Jane Does 2-8 (Pike, Michael) (Entered: 06/11/2010) 06/11/2010 562 NOTICE by Jane Doe of Withdrawal of Subpoenas (Mermelstein. Stuart) (Entered: 06/11/2010) 06/14/2010 563 NOTICE by Jane Doe of Withdrawal of Subpoena (Arbour. Jessica) (Entered: 06/14/2010) 06/14/2010 56

laintiff's MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support by Jane Doe No. 4. (Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: 04/20/2009) RESPONSE in Opposition re 72 Defendant's MOTION to Stay re 62 Amended Complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 4. (Mermelste

for Extension of Time to File Response as to 13 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 1 ComplaintDefendant's MOTION to Dismiss 1 Complaint by Jane Doe II. (Garcia, Isidro) (Entered: 05/15/2009) ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot 16 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's respons

DATE &TIME Jane Doe #4 September 16, 2009 c/o Mermelstein & Horowitz PA at 1:00 PM 18205 Biscayne Bouleva

I'm sorry. The U.S. Attorney. THE COURT: Mr. Garcia. MR. GARCIA: Thank you, Your Honor. 22 If I m

named partner in Mr. Herman's firm. See Tab 31, Florida Bar Website page. 39. Mr. Herman, who is the named partner in the former firm of Herman, Mermelstein, filed five lawsuits, each asking for $50 million, against Mr. Epstein. Each lawsuit is entitled "Jane Doe # vs. Jeffrey Epstein," despite the fact

ember 24, 2007 Email from J. Lefkowitz to 22. Ms. replied that she had "forwarded your message only to Alex [Acosta], Andy [Lourie], and Rolando [Garcia]. I don't anticipate it going any further than that." Id. 23. Ms. stated that the agreement would be "placed in the case file, which will be kept

witz, Adam D [COR LD NTC] Mermelstein & Horowitz PA 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami. FL. USA 33160 AHOROWITZ[#064]SEXABUSEATTORNEY.COM Mermelstein, Stuart S [COR LD NTC] Mermelstein & Horowitz PA 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL, USA 33160 DEFENDANT ATTORNEY(S): Pike, Michael J

Edwards, Bradley James [COR LD NTC] Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman PL 425 N Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA 33301 Garcia, Isidro Manuel [COR LD NTC] Garcia Elkins & Boehringer 224 Datura Avenue Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL, USA 33401 DEFENDANT ATTORNEY(S): Kalland

arcia Innle ' Katherine Warthen ell Michael James Pike Paul G Cassell Richard Horace Willits Robert C. Josefsberg Adam D. Horowitz Stuart S Mermelstein William J. Realer 11 EFTA00182843 Case 5:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 114 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/05/2009 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO

[FN6] (4) Chuy Hinojosa, [FN7] (5) Guadalupe Ba- rajas, [FN8] (6) Federico Morales, [FN9] (7) *835 Alejandro Cano, IFN 1 0] and (8) Mario Meliton Garcia. [FN II] FN4. Castaneda told the government that, in addition to Reyes's involvement in drug trafficking, he often paid large sums of cash to She

to File Response /Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action by Jane Doe No. 7. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: 04/13/2009) 04/14/2009 34 ENDORSED ORDER granting (75) Motion for Extension of Time to Respond re (65 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) De

for Extension of Time to File Response as to B Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 1 ComplaintDefendant's MOTION to Dismiss 1 Complaint by Jane Doe II. (Garcia, Isidro) (Entered: 05/15/2009) 05/19/2009 17 ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot j Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss. Plain