ey Epstein Joint Notice of Withdrawal as to Jane Does 2-8 (Pike, Michael) (Entered: 06/11/2010) 562 NOTICE by Jane Doe of Withdrawal of Subpoenas (Mermelstein. Stuart) (Entered: 06/11/2010) 563 NOTICE by Jane Doe of Withdrawal of Subpoena (Arbour, Jessica) (Entered: 06/14/2010) 564 ORDER withdrawing 48

57 Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support by Jane Doe. (Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: 04/20/2009) RESPONSE in Opposition re 65 Defendant% MOTION to Stay re 56 Amended Complaint filed by Jane Doe. (Mermelstein, Stua

08/13/2009) 266 REPLY to Response to Motion re 226 Plaintiff's MOTION for Protective Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Jane Doe. (Mermelstein. Stuart) (Entered: 08/14/2009) 267 NOTICE by Jane Doe of Filing Declarations of Jane Doe No. 4 and Y.B. in Further Support of Plaintiffs' Jane Do

oint Notice of Withdrawal as to Jane Does 2-8 (Pike, Michael) (Entered: 06/11/2010) 06/11/2010 562 NOTICE by Jane Doe of Withdrawal of Subpoenas (Mermelstein. Stuart) (Entered: 06/11/2010) 06/14/2010 563 NOTICE by Jane Doe of Withdrawal of Subpoena (Arbour. Jessica) (Entered: 06/14/2010) 06/14/2010 56

laintiff's MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support by Jane Doe No. 4. (Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: 04/20/2009) RESPONSE in Opposition re 72 Defendant's MOTION to Stay re 62 Amended Complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 4. (Mermelste

with legal assistant regarding filing of Federal Court Motions to 0.25 hr $75.00 Compel and Exhibits 04/02/2009 RHB Review correspondence from Mermelstein (JD Nos. 2-7) regarding tax returns 0.10 hr $30.00 04/02/2009 RHB Review Plaintiffs Response to Motion to Quash based on 5th Amendment (E.W.) 0

isa re: povider records; finalize letter to Mamie!stein; finalize Motion to separate Does 2 through 7 as not consolidated: fax letter and motion to Mermelstein: go through task list with MJP; conference with JMB; pull and copy several documents for JMB; pull letters from RDC stacks to copy for EW case; pre

you're not required to 3 assume because some lawyers ask you a leading 4 question or suggested in a report or like the 5 police report like Mr. Mermelstein and Mr. Edwards 6 did, that did you tell the police officers X, Y, 7 or Z without showing you the statement. You're 8 not required to guess, I

Q. And when we were here, I think it was 11 last week or the last ten days anyway -- I could 12 tell you. On July 29th of this year, and Mr. 13 Mermelstein started with your deposition and then 14 others asked questions, when Mr. Mermelstein and I 15 think Mr. Edwards asked questions about did you 16

6 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 EXHIBITS 1 Message pad 2 Documents INDEX OF EXAMINATION WITNESS DIRECT CROSS ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ (By Mr. Mermelstein) 12 (By Mr. Edwards) 157 (By Mr. Langino) 260 INDEX OF EXHIBITS PAGE 72 115 Page 6 Page 8 1 Doe right here on the copy you gave me. I'm

Richard Willits, representing MR. BERGER: William J. Berger, representing M., M. and Jane Doc number two. MR. MERMELSTEIN: Stuart Mennetstein of Mermelstein and Horowitz. representing Jane Does numbers two through eight. MR. LANGINO: Adam Langino, on behalf of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

21 Q. All right. And how did you happen to get that 22 MR. MERMELSTEIN: Stuart Mermelstein of 22 job? Was it through an employment agency -- 23 Mermelstein and Horowitz. representing Jane Does 23 A. No. 24 numbers two through eight. 24 Q. -- or an ad in the paper? 25 MR. LANGINO: Adam Langino. on

t Epstein, other civil attorneys were filing similar lawsuits against Epstein. For example, on or about April 14, 2008 another law firm, Herman and Mermelstein, filed the first civil action against Epstein on behalf of one of its seven clients who were molested by Epstein. The complaints that attorney Herma

tion of his Fifth Amendment rights. In fact, the Mermelstein and Horowitz firm was quoted in the Palm Beach P

Response to Motion, to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents by Jane Doe No. 5. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: 04/03/2009) 04/13/2009 73 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response /Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Stay a

Response to Motion, to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents by Jane Doe No. 3. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: 04/03/2009) 04/06/2009 61 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to $1 MOTION for Protective Order Agains

resent: Sean McGuire, Videographer U.S. Legal Support 0003 1 2 3 INDEX Page Direct Examination By Mr. Edwards 7 4 Cross-Examination By Mr. Mermelstein 111 Redirect Examination By Mr. Edwards 127 5 Recross-Examination By Mr. Mermelstein 133 6 7 Certificate of Oath 137 8 Certificate of Rep

AIL] - Re: Availability tomorrow? Just wanted to make sure you were sending the info we discussed. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 2, 2021, at 9:18 PM, Mermelstein, Sure, I'm generally around tomorrow. From: [email protected]> Sent: Thursday, September 2, 20219:01 PM To: Subject: Availability tomorrow?

tz, Adam D (COR LD NTC) Mermelstein & Horowitz PA 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL, USA 33160 z0 to cp 3z 0 8S 0 0 CO C.D --4 Mermelstein, Stuart S [COR LD NTC1 ABR Research Prolik modified 6' 13.2007 Fur internal use only Last EFTA01355621

iami USA 33 (-) Doe No 4 v. Epstein 9:08cv80380 co z0 to cp 3z • 2 0t O 0 CO 0) 03 a 00 a Fax li s - <.> nded 06/ 10/ 2010<1 I> Email: Mermelstein, Stuart S [COR LD NTC) Mermelstein & Horowitz PA 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami FL A 331I m Fax: Email: DEFENDANT ATTORNEY(S): Epst

y Jane Doe re [333] Plaintiffs MOTION to Compel Responses to Requests for Net Worth Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Jane Doe (Mermelstein, Stuart) 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Notice has been electronically mailed to: Adam D. Horowitz Bradley James Edwards Isidro Manuel Garcia Jack Alan Goldb

Response to Motion, to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents by Jane Doe No. 4. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: 04/03/2009) 04/06/2009 71 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to 21 MOTION for Protective Order Agains

Jane Doe Document Number:493 Docket Text: APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court by Jane Doe re 14801 Order on Motion to Compel (Mermelstein, Stuart) 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM Notice has been electronically mailed to: Adam D. Horowitz Bradley James Edwards Isidro Manuel Garcia Jack Alan Gold

edacted Versions of Sensitive Fifth Amendment Arguments and Submit Un-Redacted Arguments to the Court filed by Jane Doe. Replies due by 4/22/2010. (Mermelstein, Stuart) 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Notice has been electronically mailed to: Adam D. Horowitz • I. Bradley James Edwards Isidro Manuel Garcia Jack Ala

Doe v. Epstein Case Number: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Filer: Jane Doe Document Number: se Docket Text: NOTICE by Jane Doe of Withdrawal of Subpoenas (Mermelstein, Stuart) 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM Notice has been electronically mailed to: Adam D. Horowitz Bradley James Edwards Isidro Manuel Garcia Jack Alan Gold

-I 1 • > r- -o Horowitz, Adam D [COR LD NTC] x• Mermelstein & Horowitz PA 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL, USA 33160 -4 0 m Mermelstein. Stuart S [COR LD NTC] Mermelstein & Horowitz PA 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami FL USA 33160 CD z0 rn cp 3z to 2 --4 0 0 CO O CO