Back to Network
7
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
Document Mentions (7 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
prove that the defendant's sole purpose for traveling and transporting the individual was to have the individual engage in illegal sexual activity. Mortensen v. United States , 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944); Crespo v. United States , 151 F.2d 44, 46 (1st Cir. 1945). This offense carries a statutory maximum of
broadens the conduct covered by the guideline beyond prostitution to encompass all commercial sex acts, consistent with the scope of the Act.. . . U.S.S.G. App. C, Vol II, Amendment 641 (emphasis added). The reference to child pornography is especially helpful to us, because the child pornography statutes
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
prove that the defendant's sole purpose for traveling and transporting the individual was to have the individual engage in illegal sexual activity. Mortensen v. United States , 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944); Crespo v. United States , 151 F.2d 44, 46 (1st Cir. 1945). This offense carries a statutory maximum of
broadens the conduct covered by the guideline beyond prostitution to encompass all commercial sex acts, consistent with the scope of the Act.. . . U.S.S.G. App. C, Vol II, Amendment 641 (emphasis added). The reference to child pornography is especially helpful to us, because the child pornography statutes
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
prove that the defendant's sole purpose for traveling and transporting the individual was to have the individual engage in illegal sexual activity. Mortensen. United States, 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944); Crespo I. United States, 151 F.2d 44, 46 (1st Cir. 1945). This offense carries a statutory maximum of ten
roadens the conduct covered by the guideline beyond prostitution to encompass all commercial sex acts, consistent with the scope of the Act. . . . U.S.S.G. App. C, Vol II, Amendment 641 (emphasis added). The reference to child pornography is especially helpful to us, because the child pornography statutes
Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA02857524_p20
oadens the conduct covered by the guideline beyond prostitution •to encompass all commercial sex acts, consistent with the scope of the Act. . . . U.S.S.G. App. C, Vol H, Amendment 641 (emphasis added). The reference to child pornography is especially helpful to us, because the child pornography statutes u
Page: EFTA02857524_p20 →Page EFTA02857524_p23
prove that the defendant's sole purpose for traveling and transporting the individual was to have the individual engage in illegal sexual activity. Mortensen v. United States, 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944); Crespo v. United States, 151 F.2d 44, 46 (1st Cir. 1945). This offense carries a statutory maximum of t
Page: EFTA02857524_p23 →2 mentions
Page EFTA02857732_p11
broadens the conduct covered by the guideline beyond prostitution to encompass all commercial sex acts, consistent with the scope of the Act. . . . U.S.S.G. App. C, Vol II, Amendment 641 (emphasis added). The reference to child pornography is especially helpful to us, because the child pornography statutes
Page: EFTA02857732_p11 →Page EFTA02857732_p13
prove that the defendant's sole purpose for traveling and transporting the individual was to have the individual engage in illegal sexual activity. Mortensen v. United States , 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944); Crespo v. United States , 151 F.2d 44, 46 (1st Cir. 1945). This offense carries a statutory maximum of
Page: EFTA02857732_p13 →2 mentions
Page EFTA02857763_p11
broadens the conduct covered by the guideline beyond prostitution to encompass all commercial sex acts, consistent with the scope of the Act. . . . U.S.S.G. App. C, Vol II, Amendment 641 (emphasis added). The reference to child pornography is especially helpful to us, because the child pornography statutes
Page: EFTA02857763_p11 →Page EFTA02857763_p13
prove that the defendant's sole purpose for traveling and transporting the individual was to have the individual engage in illegal sexual activity. Mortensen v. United States , 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944); Crespo v. United States , 151 F.2d 44, 46 (1st Cir. 1945). This offense carries a statutory maximum of
Page: EFTA02857763_p13 →Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA02857810_p11
broadens the conduct covered by the guideline beyond prostitution to encompass all commercial sex acts, consistent with the scope of the Act. . . . U.S.S.G. App. C, Vol II, Amendment 641 (emphasis added). The reference to child pornography is especially helpful to us, because the child pornography statutes
Page: EFTA02857810_p11 →Page EFTA02857810_p12
prove that the defendant's sole purpose for traveling and transporting the individual was to have the individual engage in illegal sexual activity. Mortensen v. United States , 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944); Crespo v. United States , 151 F.2d 44, 46 (1st Cir. 1945). This offense carries a statutory maximum of
Page: EFTA02857810_p12 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (158)
Entities connected to both Mortensen and U.S.S.G. App
United States
LOCATION26 w/ Mortensen·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON25 w/ Mortensen·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
LB
Leon Black
PERSON19 w/ Mortensen·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
EL
Ellis
PERSON18 w/ Mortensen·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION18 w/ Mortensen·6 w/ U.S.S.G.
Jennifer Lopez
PERSON17 w/ Mortensen·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
EV
Evans
PERSON18 w/ Mortensen·6 w/ U.S.S.G.
Alexander Acosta
PERSON17 w/ Mortensen·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
HA
Hayward
PERSON16 w/ Mortensen·6 w/ U.S.S.G.
Cleveland
LOCATION14 w/ Mortensen·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
GA
Garcia-Lopez
PERSON14 w/ Mortensen·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON13 w/ Mortensen·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
GL
Gerald Lefcourt
PERSON14 w/ Mortensen·6 w/ U.S.S.G.
RB
Roy Black
PERSON14 w/ Mortensen·6 w/ U.S.S.G.
Criminal Division
ORGANIZATION12 w/ Mortensen·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
AS
Ann Sanchez
PERSON13 w/ Mortensen·6 w/ U.S.S.G.
Naomi Campbell
PERSON12 w/ Mortensen·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
Northern Region
LOCATION11 w/ Mortensen·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
Marc Rich
PERSON12 w/ Mortensen·6 w/ U.S.S.G.
ME
Meacham
PERSON11 w/ Mortensen·7 w/ U.S.S.G.