Epstein Secrets

etter that he reached out to AAG Fisher to ask that she review this matter and to expedite the process. See December 19, 2007 Letter from Acosta to Sanchez. EFTA00731106 Ms. A. Marie Villafana, Esq. June 16, 2009 Page 3 • In the beginning of January, 2008, Mr. Acosta and I discussed the need for f

ocuments, we presented you with your own email that acknowledged the sheriff had discretion in the matter. See July 3, 2008 Email from Villafana to Michael Gauger ("If Mr. Epstein is truly eligible for the [work release] program, we have no objection to him being treated like any other similarly situated pris

e NPA. As you know from past experience, and as Mr. Acostuaviously acknowledged in letters to my partner Ken Starr (on December 4, 2007) and Lilly Sanchez (on December 19, 2007), the language of 18 is "far from simple," and, in certain respects, subject to significant ambiguity. I believe it is both n

h you had previously acknowledged that the sheriff had discretion in the matter. See Exhibit 24, July 3, 2008 Email from Assistant U.S. Attorney to Michael Gauger ("If Mr. Epstein is truly eligible for the [work release] program, we have no objection to him being treated like any other similarly situated priso

his attorneys and your office, Epstein secretly withheld correspondence by several of his mostii ral owered attorneys — namely Ken Starr and Lilly. Sanchez. Epstein settled the case wit within days after this limited production, and we did not realize the absence of what must have been critical discuss

tact me with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: Assistant United States Attorney cc: Colonel Michael Gauger Chief, Northern Division I EFTA00232797 EFTA00232798 U.S. Department ofJustice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida VIA HAND