Epstein Secrets

NEY DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Lilly Ann Sanchez Fowler White Burnett, PA 1395 Stickel! Ave, le Floor Miami, FL 33131 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. Sanchez: 99N£ !Street USK FL 13112 003)961.9100 - Tetteatle O03)3366444 - FaesteSk December 19, 2007 I write to follow up on the December le meeting be

s they agreed to be bound by a Protective Order. Each victim (or her attorney) was provided with notice of the Court's ruling, and several executed the Protective Order and were provided with copies of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. From the beginning, Epstein has "vigorously defended" the suits, and has filed seve

elf and Jay Lefkowitz discussing the U.S. Attorney's insistence on eighteen months of incarceration. You will recall that at one meeting you and Ms. Sanchez raised the idea of Mr. Epstein hiring Sheriff's Deputies to guard him as equivalent to imprisonment. Mr. Acosta specifically rejected that suggesti

to be bound by a Protective Order entered by the Court. If Ms. would like to review the Agreement, please let me know, and I will forward a copy of the Protective Order for her signature. As I stated in my earlier notification, please understand that neither the U.S. Attorney's Office nor the Federal Bureau of Inv

expeditiously. On September 7, 2007,1, along withFAUSA Sloman, AUSAs McMillan and Villafafta, and FBI agents, met with you, Mr. Lefkowitz, and Ms. Sanchez. I understood that you wished to present federalism-based concerns regarding our prosecution. To ensure a full consideration of your arguments, I i

tters that were sent to Jane Doe #1. 12. In accordance with the Court's instructions at the status conference of August 14, 2008 and the terms of the Protective Order entered by the Court on August 21, 2008, EFTA00234651 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2008 Page 4 of 4 beginni

to Washington would be undertaken expeditiously. On September 7, 2007,1, along withFAUSA OM AUSAs FBI agents, met with you, Mr. Lefkowitz, and Ms. Sanchez. I understood that you wished to present federalism-based regarding ur prosecution. To ensure a Ml consideration of your arguments, 1 invite Chie

tters that were sent to Jane Doe #1. 12. In accordance with the Court's instructions at the status conference of August 14, 2008 and the terms of the Protective Order entered by the Court on August 21, 2008, EFTA00213129 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2008 Page 4 of 4 beginni

computer equipment. Epstein’s team sought to postpone compliance with the USAO’s demand for the equipment. In late June 2007, defense attorney Sanchez requested an extension of time to comply; in informing Sloman, Menchel, and Lourie of the request, Villafaña stressed that “we want to get the comp

d by a Protective Order entered by the Court. If [the victim] would like to review the Agreement, please let me know, and I will forward a copy of the Protective Order for her signature. The government shared draft versions of the September letter with Epstein’s counsel and responded to criticism of the content o