Epstein Secrets

d federal law. WHEREFORE, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully requests that service of process be quashed. Respectfully submitted, s/Lilly Arm Sanchez Christopher E Knight Lilly Ann Sanchez Helaine S. Goodner FOWLER WHITE BURNECt PA. Telephone: Facsimile: Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein

lbox at Mr. Epstein's vacation home at 9 East 7O Street, New York, New York. The envelope contained a Summons and Complaint in the subject action, a Civil Rico Case Statement, a deposition subpoena, notices of video depositions, interrogatories and requests for production. (Ex. A, Aff. Richard Barnett

court; 6/25/07 Lefcourt to Sloman & Lourie; 7/6/07 Lefcourt & Dershowitz to Sloman; 7/25/07 Lefcourt & Dershowitz to Menchel; 8/2/07 EFTA00066350 Sanchez to Menchel; 8/3/07 Menchel to Sanchez; 9/17/07 to Lekowitz; 10/25/07 Sloman Itr to Davis; 11/8/07 Lefkowitz to Sloman; 11/13/07 Sloman to Lefkowitz

e Doe case (DE27); DE 99 Order; Westlaw research on Obstruction of Justice Charges can be based on false statements in state depositions, including Civil depo, if it is likely to be turned over to federal investigation; DE15-2 Exhibit A; "Prince's friendship with pedophile causes furor across the pond

f Florida R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES "EMMET December 19, 2007 DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Lilly Ann Sanchez ism Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. Sanchez: I write to follow up on the December I4th meeting between defense counsel and the Eps prosecutors, as well as our First Assistant, the Miami FBI S

mi. FL 33132 November 2, 2010 Via E-Mail Privileged Communication Wifredo A. Ferrer, United States Attorney First Assistant U.S. Attorney AUSA, Civil Chief AUSA, Senior Litigation Counsel USA, Deputy Chief WPB AUSA Office of the United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4th St

willful breach. Paragraph 8 and its waiver provisions are not clear (or as stated by Mr. Acosta are "far from simple," see Mr. Acosta letter to Ms. Sanchez, December 19, 2007). Paragraph 8 does not "speak for itself." That the provisions of ¶8 are "far from simple" is illustrated in the construction of

Procedure." §2255 is contained in "Part I. Crimes, Chap. 110. Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children." 18 U.S.C. §2255 (2002), is entitled Civil remedy for personal injuries, and provides: (a) Any minor who is a victim of a violation of section 2241(c), 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A,

willful breach. Paragraph 8 and its waiver provisions are not clear (or as stated by Mr. Acosta are "far from simple," see Mr. Acosta letter to Ms. Sanchez, December 19, 2007). Paragraph 8 does not "speak for itself." That the provisions of ¶8 are "far from simple" is illustrated in the construction of

minal Procedure." §2255 is contained in "Part I. Crimes, Chap. 110. Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children." 18 §2255 (2002), is entitled Civil remedy for personal injuries, and provides: (a) Any minor who is a victim of a violation of section 22411, 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A, 2

NITED STATES ATTORNEY NLIVERY BY FACSIMILE Lilly Ann Sanchez Fowler White Burnett, PA 11Of II.;•.1.A.111 A. . Igh Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. Sanchez: 99 N.E 4 Simi Mann* FL 33132 (305) 961-9I00 • Telephone O0O530-6444 • Facsimile December 19, 2007 I write to follow up on the December I41h me

Procedure." §2255 is contained in "Part I. Crimes, Chap. 110. Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children." I8 U.S.C. §2255 (2002), is entitled Civil remedy for personal injuries, and provides: (a) Any minor who is a victim of a violation of section 224I(c), 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A,