Epstein Secrets

Madly (213) 680-8440 [email protected] 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, California 90017 (213)680'8400 www.kirkland.com June 19,2008 John Roth, Esq. Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Aven

eral charges that limited Epstein's sentencing exposure . . . " See Tab 1, May 19, 2008 Letter from J. . In fact, by a email dated August 3, 2007, Criminal Division Chief Matthew Menchel advised the defense that the federal government required a minimum term of two years of incarceration. See Tab 40, August 3,

was prepared again, and was reviewed in anticipation of presentation to the grand jury. On June 23, 2008, Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General John Roth denied the various appeals of Epstein's attorneys and wrote, "Even if we were to substitute our judgment for that of the U.S. Attorney, we believe

tion of Breach USAO No. 2006R01181 June 9, 2009 To Jeffrey H. Sloman Acting United States Attorney First Assistant U.S. Attorney Deputy Chief, Criminal Division, West Palm Beach Chief Chief, Criminal Section I, Northern Division, WPB From AUSA, Ft Lauderdale INTRODUCTION This memorandum seeks approval t

tact in the USAO. If 879 EFTA00180205 you do decide to send us something, it would be most useful to get it by the middle of next week. Thanks. John Roth Associate Deputy Attorney General ***********************************************###********* The information contained in this communication is

AM To <IIIIIIIINSIII CC Subject Epstein , <Ken.StarrOpepperdine.edu> Sorry for the phone tag. We have all of your letters to both SDFL and the Criminal Division, but feel free to supplement that if you wish. It is best simply to send it by 'Email to me, with a copy to your contact in the USAO. If 879 EFTA0

h a copy to your contact in the USAO. If you do decide to send us something, it would be most useful to get it by the middle of next week. Thanks. John Roth Associate De uty Attorney General ******************************************************###** The information contained in this communication is

3Ousdoi.gov> 06/11/2008 07:08 AM To MIIIIIINIMIL, < CC Subject Epstein Sorry for the phone tag. We have all of your letters to both SDFL and the Criminal Division, but feel free to supplement that if you wish. It is best simply to send it by 'Email to me, with a copy to your contact in the USAO. If you do dec

May 28, 2008 4:51 p.m., RE: Jeffrey Epstein (1 page) Letter to Kenneth Starr and Joe D. Whitley, dated June 3, 2008, No Subject (1 page), Author: John Roth, Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General Letter to John Roth, Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General, dated June 19, 2008, No Subject (14 pages

or: A. Marie Villafana. Addressees: R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney; Jeff Sloman, First Assistant U.S. Attorney; Matthew Menchel, Chief, Criminal Division; Andrew Lourie; Managing Assistant U.S. Attorney, Northern Region; and Karen Atkinson, Chief, Northern Region. (P). Draft Indictment (54 pages)(P)

th Figueroa Street Los Angeles, California 90017 Kenneth W. Starr : To Call Writer Directly: FP Facsimile: www.kirkland.com Dir. Fax: June 19, 2008 John Roth, Esq. Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue

our review of this case is limited both factually and legally. We have not looked at the entire universe of facts in this case. It is not the role of the Criminal Division to conduct a complete factual inquiry from scratch.” (CEOS letter at p. 1). Indeed, entire subject areas relevant to the inquiry were not considered

E. MCHUGH P. 0. 00X 3301 CHARLESTON, WEST VIRGINIA 25333-3394 500 LEE STREET. EAST. SMITE 800 CHARLESTON. WEST VIRGINIA 25301 June 19, 2008 Mr. John Roth Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

ur review of this case is limited both factually and legally. We have not looked at the entire universe of facts in this case. It is not the role of the Criminal Division to conduct a complete factual inquiry from scratch." (CEOS letter at p. 1). Indeed, entire subject areas relevant to the inquiry were not considere