5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
6 / 5
Mentions
ity applied in construing a statute, Defendant's position as to the meaning of the statute would prevail over Plaintiffs view. See United States v. Santos 128 S.Ct. 2020, 2025 (2008). As summarized by the United States Supreme Court in Santos, supra, at 2025: ... The rule of lenity requires ambiguous
te would prevail over Plaintiffs view. See United States v. Santos 128 S.Ct. 2020, 2025 (2008). As summarized by the United States Supreme Court in Santos, supra, at 2025: ... The rule of lenity requires ambiguous criminal laws to be interpreted in favor of the defendants subjected to them. See United
ell-pleaded complaint may proceed even if it appears "that a recovery is very remote and unlikely"). In discussing Twombly, the Eleventh Circuit in Watts v. Fla. International Univ., 495 F.3d 1289, 1295 (11th Cir. 2007), noted - "The Supreme Court's most recent formulation of the pleading specificity
ity applied in construing a statute, Defendant's position as to the meaning of the statute would prevail over Plaintiffs view. See United States v. Santos, 128 S.Ct. 2020, 2025 (2008). As summarized by the United States Supreme Court in Santos, supra, at 2025: ... The rule of lenity requires ambiguous
ell-pleaded complaint may proceed even if it appears "that a recovery is very remote and unlikely"). In discussing Twombly. the Eleventh Circuit in Watts v. Fla. International Univ., 495 F.3d 1289, 1295 (11 th Cir. 2007), noted - "The Supreme Court's most recent formulation of the pleading specificit
9-KAM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/06/2009 Page 24 of 29 Jane Doe II v. Epstein, et al. Page 24 Plaintiff's view. See United States v. Santos, 128 S.Ct. 2020, 2025 (2008). As summarized by the United States Supreme Court in Santos supra, at 2025: ... The rule of lenity requires ambiguous
favorable to the plaintiff. M.T.V. v. DeKalb County Sch. Dist. 446 F.3d 1153, 1156 (11th Cir.2006). In discussing Twombly, the Eleventh Circuit in Watts v. Fla. International Univ., 495 F.3d 1289, 1295 (11th Cir. 2007), noted - "The Supreme Court's most recent formulation of the pleading specificity
wagered roth the adicated melon We Intoned you of therationale alien you owned file =cum In this taw. /OW hrds and earn is are looted a 185 knout Santos aid not the wroducre Weer, aid you must may a rope of an moorage:4bn to both Wm. All ACCOutIC Stawrencs shall be defined COMplate and acaratedra o
sion or envoi The* asses are devised on yam gateman foe irdonnananal puma. onre Reunions and vabli present ao retry:led byte Mung lion IRS lnancia Watts i not rehonsble for this atom:vim and doesrot suarlee to arettcy these assets tenet prowled by SIC or the FM's supplitmema SIC coverage • Revenue
grant with the oficieed nfluon We Wormed you of thoretetionrap when ya., opened 4th =tyre In this taw, yrar kals and soma les re looted 2185 Fame Santos aid not the rtrodumg brave. ad you rant flatterer:et any eta aortic:Abu to tomb km All accounc StaterentS Shall be leaned arnplate and acarate d m
ternent of Credit Practices anilable in Agreement and Dabsonss at goy ea< contrwennordrtdm• vet Yew reels Your statement temins *Cunt*, and other Watts hell the account at the end of to statement period. You may ask for defreerY of by paid sentries al al time. You may receive securities used as lo
Entities connected to both Santos and Watts

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Vicky Ward
PERSON
Condoleezza Rice
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
Joi Ito
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSONDaphne Wallace
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
Prince Charles
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSON
Mao Zedong
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Oliver Stone
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATIONDoug Band
PERSON