Epstein Secrets

hearing had been scheduled to determine a risk assessment level, accompanied by a copy of the recommendation of the Board. See A.67 (Letter from Supreme Court, dated Aug. 26, 2010); A.65 (Recommendation of Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders ("Board Recommendation").). In stark contrast to the other

y interests and triggers due process safeguards). Courts evaluating that liberty interest under the procedural due process analysis articulated by the U.S. Supreme Court in Matthews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976) (balancing the private interest affected by state action, the risk of erroneous deprivation of that i

level for a person for whom registration is required. During the incarcerative portion of Mr. Epstein's sentence, he was allowed to participate in the Sheriffs Office work release program, an option thatwould not have been available to him had he been at a higher registration level. Additionally, while Mr. Epstein

RA hearing had been scheduled to determine a risk assessment level, accompanied by a copy of the recommendation of the Board. See A67 (Letter from Supreme Court, dated Aug. 26, 2010); A.65 (Recommendation of Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders ("Board Recommendation").). In stark contrast to the other

y interests and triggers due process safeguards). Courts evaluating that liberty interest under the procedural due process analysis articulated by the U.S. Supreme Court in Matthews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976) (balancing the private interest affected by state action, the risk of erroneous deprivation of that i

level for a person for whom registration is required. During the incarcerative portion of Mr. Epstein's sentence, he was allowed to participate in the Sheriffs Office work release program, an option thatwould not have been available to him had he been at a higher registration level. Additionally, while Mr. Epstein

, New York 10022-4611 Telephone: (212) 446-4800 Facsimile: (212) 446-4900 1. Attorneks for Defendant Jeffrey E. E PFetPth I LED FEB 0 9 2011 IESUPRUME COURT NEW YORK COUNTY APPSALn C41.1911eO1/41.3 EFTA00792406 A4 Order Appealed From, dated January 18, 2011 with Notice of Entr) [pp. A4-ASI • pa*

level for a person for whom registration is required. During the incarcerative portion of Mr. Epstein's sentence, he was allowed to participate in the Sheriffs Office work release program, an option that would not have been available to him had he been at a higher registration level. Additionally, while Mr. Epstei

RORR: All right. And, also, I don't think the Court -- I think the Court needs to deal with this immliately, expeditiously. VAS is a matter that the Suprema Court hes placed incredible scrutiny over. And the Rule that we are traveling under -- we're not only traveling under a Rule of Judicial administration t

hiring Sheriff's Deputies to guard him as equivalent to imprisonment. Mr. Acosta specifically rejected that suggestion. It is our understanding from the Sheriffs Office that Mr. Epstein is paying off-duty Sheriffs Deputies to guard him while he "works" at Mr. EFTA00183588 ROY BLACK, EsQ. Novsmass. 24, 2008 PAGE