Epstein Secrets

e, as a matter of constitutional law, required to be even clearer and less subject to common law expansion than state statutes. As far back as 1812, the Supreme Court has held that there could be no common law crimes under federal law. See United States v. Hudson, 7 Cranch 32, 43 (1812) ("[O]ur Courts no doubt pos

of differing constructions,' due process requires a strict construction of the language in the defendant's favor under the rule of lenity") (citing F. Stat. § 6 As we have made clear throughout this investigation, the alleged conduct does not implicate over-arching federal interests because the conduc

e, as a matter of constitutional law. required to be even clearer and less subject to common law expansion than stair statutes. As far back as 1812. the Supreme Court has held that there could be no common law crimes under federal law. See United States v. Hudson. 7 Cranch 32. 43 (1812) (-1O1ur Courts no doubt pos

of differing constructions.' due process requires a strict construction of the language in the defendant's favor under the rule of lenity") (citing F. Stat. 775.021(1) (1995); Perkins v. State. 576 80.2d 1310. 1312 (Fla. 1991): Logan v. State, 666 So.2d 260.261 (Flu. 4th DCA 1996)). • Plain Meatninzt

e, as a matter of constitutional law. required to he even clearer and less subject to common law expansion than state statutes. As far hack as 1812. the Supreme Court has held that there could he no common law crimes tinder federal law. Sec United Slates r. Ihtdcon. 7 Crunch 32. 43 (1812) (•yO)ur Courts no doubt p

of differing constructions.' due pn'ccss requires a strict construction of the language in the defendant's favor under the rule of lenity") (riling F. Stat. 775.021( I ) (1995): Perkins it State, 576 So.2d 1310. 1312 (Fla. 1991): Logan it State, 666 So.2d 260. 261 (Fla. 4th ocA 1996)). • Plain Meaning