Epstein Secrets

r the witnesses to appear on July 10, 2007, but pursuant to an agreement between the parties, the appearance was moved to July 17, 2007. Neither Mr. Riley nor the records custodian appeared, and counsel for Jeffrey Epstein filed the instant motion on July 17, 2007, shortly before the 4:00 appearance t

six arguments against the enforceability of the two grand jury subpoenas: first, that Epstein's act-of-production privilege bars the subpoenas to Riley and Riley Kiraly; second, that the subpoenas violate Epstein's Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment rights; third, that the subpoenas are unreasonable

lSince the start of the federal investigation the team has grown to include former U.S. Attorney Guy Lewis and former Assistant U.S. Attorneys Lilly Ann Sanchez and Michael Teen. FSThe wires and peripheral devices were present but the central processing units ("CPUs") were gone. is one of Epstein's personal

THE GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO INTERVENE AND TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS AND CROSS MOTION TO COMPEL William Riley and Riley Kiraly ("Riley"). by and through undersigned counsel, file this Reply to the Response of the United States to the Motion of Jeffrey Epstein to Intervene and to Qu

Motion of Jeffrey Epstein to Intervene and to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas and Cross Motion to Compel to respond to the Government's assertions that Riley failed to appear before the grand jury.' The Government is mistaken. Riley's appearance before the grand jury was originally scheduled for July 10.

e-week extension already requested by Ms. Sanchez prior to Mr. Richey's appearance as counsel for Mr...I cc: , Esq. William Richey, Esq. Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. B Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta Assistant United States Attorney EFTA00178979 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney South

t is to these portions of the response to which this reply is directed. I. The first area which requires reply is the government's assertions that Riley simply failed, without notice and without excuse, to appear at the time scheduled for his grand jury appearance. See Response at 1, 5, 6 n.6. This

nued from July 10, 2007, until July 17, 2007, by agreement of the parties. On July 16, 2007, counsel for Epstein were informed by Deputy Chief that Riley did not have to appear physically before the grand jury if a motion to quash the subpoena was filed by Epstein before the end of the day on July 17

2 U.S. Department Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY VIA FACSIMILE Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Fowler White Burnett 1395 Brickell Ave Fl 14 Miami Florida 33131-3300 Re: Jeffrey Epstein 99 N.E. 4 Simi Ma lt Tdepbone - Facsimile Au

custody and charged with burglary, robbery, and home invasion. This is an ongoing investigation." Asked if the cops were looking into whether or not Riley had pulled the heists at the homes of Hilton, Johnson and the others, Coleman said, "That's fair to say." Wacky lackeys AND you thought P. Diddy f

ite model, still at large, to infiltrate the Hollywood party scene: "She would befriend the men, get the security codes to their homes and then send Riley in." Just before the 2004 Golden Globes, Francis returned to his Bel Air home as it was being robbed. The intruder Francis recently identified as R

ein masturbated in front of her (she was 14 at the time) and used a vibrator on her at his home in February 2005. Another Epstein attorney, Lilly Ann Sanchez dismissed it: "Jeffrey Epstein did not have sex with this woman." For those girls who claim that he did, Mr. Epsteint.lawyers maintain that he d

com which also showed various cases in which they assisted. I also located another web site under www.coralspringssparklandrotary.org in which Mr. Riley attended a Miami Rotary meeting and confirmed Atty. Roy Black is among his clientele. The tele hone calls revealed Laver had telephone contact with

ich we address more specifically the applicable law once we have had the benefit of narrowing the focus at our meeting. cc: Roy Black, Esq. Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. ri Gerald B. ( EFTA00176260 C C. c C c c t EFTA00176261 Date: 2/17/06 PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT Page: 1 Time: 11:36:35 I

com which also showed various cases in which they assisted. I also located another web site under www.coralspringssparklandrotary.org in which Mr. Riley attended a Miami Rotary meeting and confirmed Atty. Roy Black is among his clientele. The telephone calls revealed Lavery had telephone contact wit

he approval of Mr. Tein) approves of the portion of my proposed Notification that quotes directly from the U.S. Attorney's December letter to Lilly Ann Sanchez. The second portion is where Mr. Goldberger provides his interpretation of the Agreement, and nowhere mentions that he does not believe that the De

attorney client privilege. Though we are not conceding the existence of any computers that would be /Lk responsive to the subpoena served upon Mr. Riley, to the extent there are any i n. such computers, they would contain documents that are privileged attorney-client / f -t!:›1 communications and a

r. Richey's appearance as counsel for Mr. Riley. Sincerely, Assistant United States Anorncy cc; Andrew Laurie, Esq. William Richey, Esq. Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-011927 EFTA00226715 LAW O1•1Of • Of GISliALD 13. Incotrirr, •ROYESSioRRL CORIORaft0. alf EAST 7/3'- STREE

client privilege. Though we are not conceding the existence of any computers that would be 4k 2 All, responsive to the subpoena served upon Mr. Riley, to the extent there are any such computers, they would contain documents that are privileged attorney-client / 7CL.;>.1 communications and attorn

questions or would like to discuss this further, we are available. Very truly yours, a g-dtn` -2 111 Th OlottotiZ, Alan M. Dershowitz cc: Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. EFTA00226848