dentity will be revealed and feel the costs of being revealed as selfish are greater than the gains from the experiment (Delton, Krasnow, Cosmides, & Tooby, 2011). Second, we again emphasize that learned or evolved preferences and ideologies are expected to be applied even in novel settings to which they

city, configured by the tooth-for-a- tooth, Mosaic and Roman falion law, the reciprocal, economic, exchange-calculating brains of Barkow, Cosmide and Tooby’s The Adapted Mind (1992) and the terrifying stories of the Five Books of Moses, made the hopelessness of this sinner’s plight inevitable. It felt li

y in 1980 had argued that fittest genes in one generation might not be fittest in the next if niche pressures varied to counter current gene choices. Tooby had pointed to parasites and pathogens, particularly single-cell ones whose life cycle runs less than an hour. They could evolve new strains to outfl

oses, ascribed humanity, and social Rejection. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30(.): 1-23. * Populating the inner sanctum: Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., & Kurzban, R. (2003). Perceptions of race. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(4), 173-179; Kinzler, K.D, Corriveau, K.H, & Harris, P.L. (2011). Chil