offenders accountable and deterring similar conduct by others. ill The court first considers whether Thailand is an available and adequate forum. Bredimus contends the forum is available because he has stipulated to the jurisdiction of Thailand courts and Boonma resides there. The case and all partie

British nor American forum where there was no indication in record that British courts are more or less congested than American courts). Because Bredimus has the burden of showing that this factor favors dismissal, the court holds that it supports litigating the case in Texas. B *6 The court next e

at 1551 (holding that district court may determine the conditions of dismissal). Booluna may move this court to reinstate this action in the event Bredimus seeks to evade the jurisdiction of the Thailand courts or to interpose a limitations defense. • • • •11 Defendant's May 9, 2005 motion to dismiss

defendant: (1) traveled in interstate commerce and (2) acted with the intent to enga pi in illicit sexual conduct. c," See, e.g., United States Bredimus, 52 F.3d 200, 208 (5th Cir.2003); United States Hersh, zy F.3d 1233, 1246 (11th Cir.2002); nited States Gama he, 156 F.3d 1, 8 (1st Cir.1998); U

gn Commerce Clause vis-a-vis congressional authority to regulate our cit- izens' ire conduct abroad few and far between. See. e.g., United States Bredimus, 352 F.3d 200, 207-08 (5th Cir.2003 (affirming conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b), which reaches any person who travels in foreign commerce "for