al for settlement." Id. at 629. Releases are generally treated as conditions or nonmonetary terms that must be described with particularity. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Nichols, 932 So. 2d 1067, 1078 (Fla. 2006). A proposal for settlement can contain either the proposed release or a summary of the

377, 394 (1968) ("[W]e find it intolerable that one constitutional right should have to be surrendered to assert another"); Tomai-Minogue v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., 770 F.2d 1228, 1232 (4th Cir. 1985) (finding it a "questionable line of argument . . . [that] to assert her rights as a matter of p

posal for settlement.'?. at 629. Releases are generally treated as conditions or nonmonetary terms that must be described with particularity. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Nichols, 932 So. 2d 1067, 1078 (Fla, 2006). A proposal for settlement can contain either the proposed release or a summary of the

d-faith settlement cases, where "mental impressions [of the underlying counsel] are the pivotal issue in the current litigation." Holmgren v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 976 F.2d 573, 577 (9th Cir. 1992). Other than by analogizing to bad-faith actions, Petitioners have not demonstrated how delving i

d-faith settlement cases, where "mental impressions [of the underlying counsel] are the pivotal issue in the current litigation." Holmgren v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 976 F.2d 573, 577 (9th Cir. 1992). Other than by analogizing to bad-faith actions, Petitioners have not demonstrated how delving i

d-faith settlement cases, where "mental impressions [of the underlying counsel] are the pivotal issue in the current litigation." Holmgren v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 976 F.2d 573, 577 (9th Cir. 1992). Other than by analogizing to bad-faith actions, Petitioners have not demonstrated how delving i

at they "entrusted [the defendants] with the negotiation of [the transaction] based on [the defendants'] superior experience and knowledge"); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Ling, 348 So. 2d 472, 474-76 (Ala. 1977) (holding that an insurer owed a duty to disclose arising from its confidential relations

ad-faith settlement cases, where "mental impressions [of the underlying counsel) are the pivotal issue in the current litigation." Holmgren v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 976 F.2d 573, 577 (9th Cir. 1992). Other than by analogizing to bad-faith actions, Petitioners have not demonstrated how delving i