Reply (CFNRy) 2BCall Forwarding on Not Reachable (CFNRc) 31 Explicit Call Transfer (ECT) 02 Call Hold 41 Call waiting 51 Multi-Party (MPTT) NC) Legal Affairs— Law Enforcement Relations v.170711 T • -Mobile, metroPCS SDNY_GM_00170616 EFTA01342680 Switch Name Name of the switch which was used to deliv

. To allege a RICO enterprise, Plaintiff must "name a RICO person distinct from the RICO enterprise." State of Fla., Office of Atty. Gen., Dept. of Legal Affairs v. Tenet, 420 F.Supp.2d 1288 (S.D. Fla. 2005) (citation omitted). Both the United States Supreme Court and the Florida Supreme Court have required

. To allege a RICO enterprise, Plaintiff must "name a RICO person distinct from the RICO enterprise." State of Fla., Office of Atty. Gen., Dept. of Legal Affairs v. Tenet, 420 F.Supp.2d 1288 (S.D. Fla. 2005) (citation omitted). Both the United States Supreme Court and the Florida Supreme Court have required

. To allege a RICO enterprise, Plaintiff must "name a RICO person distinct from the RICO enterprise." State of Fla., Office of Atty. Gen., Dept. of Legal Affairs v. Tenet, 420 F.Supp.2d 1288 (S.D. Fla. 2005) (citation omitted). Both the United States Supreme Court and the Florida Supreme Court have required

lant, Cross-Appellee. No. 86-6880. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Sept 4, 1987. Richard E. Doran, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Legal Affairs, Miami, Fla., Peggy A. Quince, Dept. of Legal Affairs, Tampa, Fla., for respondent-appellant, cross-appel- lee. Capital Collateral Representative,