their pretrial stage, under many circumstances, will be a desirable administrative technique and is within the power of the Court." Wright & Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure §2382 (2008). See also Eagle Building Technologies 209 F.R.C. 499, 501 (S.D. Fla. 2002) (noting that Court has broad discretion under Rule 42(a) t

our Supreme Court, 'be judged with care .... Properly to balance these competing interests is a delicate and difficult task.' See Wright & Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure, §2040 at 286-87 (1970 ed.) (Emphasis added). EFTA00723287 v. Epstein Case No. 502008CA037319XXXXIM AB Epstein's Objections to BB's Request end

nel's final decision. Today, we confirm our prior ruling and grant the government's (unopposed) motion. FN3.See a1so3 Charles Alan Wright et al., Federal Practice & Procedure § 524 (3d ed.) (reporting that Rule 32 was amended to respond to "the concern that the vitally important sentencing decision will be made roneous