riate to raise it now for the first time. . . . Even were the Court to consider the argument on its merits, for the reasons explained in Jane Doe's Response Memorandum (D.E. #485), pp. 4-9, the Court finds said argument without merit." Omnibus Order, case no. 9:08-cv-80119-KAM, doc. #513, at 2-3. As noted above, a

ppear to infringe upon or otherwise implicate Epstein's rights under the Fifth Amendment, based on the particularized showing made by Epstein in his Response Memorandum, the 8 EFTA00723243 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 242 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2009 Page 9 of 22 facts alleged in the Complaints, and the

ppear to infringe upon or otherwise implicate Epstein's rights under the Fifth Amendment, based on the particularized showing made by Epstein in his Response Memorandum, the 8 EFTA00728601 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 242 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2009 Page 9 of 22 facts alleged in the Complaints, and t

bits are overruled to permit the preparation and filing of the sealed Memorandum of Law. 6. On or before November 16, 2018, Edwards shall file his Response Memorandum of Law under seal. The Memorandum is for attorneys' eyes only and shall not be shared with Epstein. Copies of the Response Memorandum shall be deli

pear to infringe upon or otherwise implicate Epstein's rights under the Fifth Amendment, based on the particularized showing made by Epstein in his Response Memorandum, the facts alleged in the Complaints, and the undersigned's knowledge of the cases, it is clear they involve compelled statements that would furnis

pear to infringe upon or otherwise implicate Epstein's rights under the Fifth Amendment, based on the particularized showing made by Epstein in his Response Memorandum, the facts alleged in the Complaints, and the undersigned's knowledge of the cases, it is clear they involve compelled statements that would furnis