) 27 Other Authorities U.S. CONST. amend. V 18, 27 U.S. CONST. amend. VI 18, 27 Rules Fed. R. App. P. 8(a)(2) 13 FED. R. Evm. 401 28 FED. R. EVID. 402 28 FED. R. EVID. 403 28 FED. R. Evm. 404(b) 28 iv EFTA00074908 Case 20-2413, Document 10-1, 07/30/2020, 2896538, Page7 of 38 Table of

GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. : 20 Cr. 330 (MN) x GHISLAINE MAXWELL'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE ANY EVIDENCE OFFERED BY THE GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. EVID. 404(b) FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE RULE'S NOTICE REQUIREMENT Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 1

t did in subsection (3). There, Congress expressly provided for change-of-plea proceedings in federal court and "comparable state procedures." FED. R. EVID. 410(3). Congress did not provide for state court pleas in subsection (4) of the rule, and "where Congress includes particular language in one secti

y the constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel and the express language of Rule 410 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(0. FED. R. EVID. 410 (discussions made EFTA00301859 during plea negotiations are "not, in any civil or criminal proceeding, admissible against the defendant who

the constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel and the express language of Rule 410 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(0. FED. R. EVID. 410 (discussions made during plea negotiations are "not, in any civil or criminal proceeding, admissible against the defendant who .. . was a parti

- sumptively authentic without final certification or permit them to be evidenced by an attested sum- mary with or without fmal certification. FED. R. EVID. 902(3). There is no requirement in Rule 902(3) that di document itself be signed. See United States Squillacote, 221 F.3d 542, 562 (4th Cir.2000)