ition under oath in a separate proceeding, and (2) these inconsistent positions were calculated to make a mockery of the judicial system." Slater v. United States Steel Corp. 871 F.3d 1174, 1181 (11th Cir. 2017) (internal quotation omitted). It should be remembered that Jane Doe 1 and 2 were confronting unprecedented sec

ition under oath in a separate proceeding, and (2) these inconsistent positions were calculated to make a mockery of the judicial system." Slater v. United States Steel Corp. 871 F.3d 1174, 1181 (11th Cir. 2017) (internal quotation omitted). It should be remembered that Jane Doe 1 and 2 were confronting unprecedented sec

rs Northeastern University Raytheon Co. Reed Elsevier StubHub Inc. Tronox Ltd. Trump Organization Inc. Twitter Inc. U.S. Chamber of Commerce United States Steel Corp. Volkswagen Warner Chilcott Limited Washington Post Co. Wayfair LLC Wells Fargo & Co. Wynn Resorts Ltd. ZTE Corp. eBay Inc. GOVERNMENT AGENCI