Back to People & Entities
NA
Nachamie
Person
18
Total Mentions
18
Documents
134
Connected Entities
Surname reference in documents
Nachamie is referenced in court documents related to legal proceedings, specifically in the context of establishing legitimate governmental interest and reasonable notice concerning the disclosure of information before trial.
Nachamie appears in several legal documents. These documents cite court cases, *United States v. Nachamie*, 91 F. Supp. 2d 552, 558-60 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) and *United States v. Nachamie*, 91 F. Supp. 2d 565, 577 & 580 (S.D.N.Y. 2000), in relation to discussions about undue harassment of cooperating witnesses and what constitutes reasonable notice to defendants prior to trial. The cases are used as precedents in arguments related to government interests and the timing of information disclosure.
Key Highlights
- •Nachamie is referenced in legal documents concerning governmental interests and reasonable notice.
- •The references are citations to *United States v. Nachamie* as a legal precedent.
Frequently Asked Questions
Books for Further Reading
Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
Julie K. Brown
Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open
Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
James Patterson
Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network
Relentless Pursuit: My Fight for the Victims of Jeffrey Epstein
Bradley J. Edwards
Victims' attorney's firsthand account
Document Mentions (18)
1 mention
he undue harassment of a cooperating witness is a legitimate governmental interest giving rise to standing in this context."); cf. United States v. Nachamie, 91 F. Supp. 2d 552, 558-60 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (concluding that the Government failed to establish a legitimate interest where, among other things, no
Page: EFTA00018240 →1 mention
ict. See, e.g., United States v. Rueb, No. 00-CR-91 (RWS), 2001 WL 96177, at *9 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 5, 2001) (thirty days before trial); United States v. Nachamie, 91 F. Supp. 2d 565, 580 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (fourteen days before trial). In addition, on April 13, 2021, the Government produced over 20,000 pages of
Page: EFTA00020292 →1 mention
he undue harassment of a cooperating witness is a legitimate governmental interest giving rise to standing in this context."); cf. United States v. Nachamie, 91 F. Supp. 2d 552, 558-60 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (concluding that the Government failed to establish a legitimate interest where, among other things, no
Page: EFTA00022031 →Sponsored
1 mention
ict. See, e.g., United States v. Rueb, No. 00-CR-91 (RWS), 2001 WL 96177, at *9 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 5, 2001) (thirty days before trial); United States v. Nachamie, 91 F. Supp. 2d 565, 580 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (fourteen days before trial). In addition, on April 13, 2021, the Government produced over 20,000 pages of
Page: EFTA00022122 →1 mention
ict. See, e.g., United States v. Rueb, No. 00-CR-91 (RWS), 2001 WL 96177, at *9 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 5, 2001) (thirty days before trial); United States v. Nachamie, 91 F. Supp. 2d 565, 580 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (fourteen days before trial). In addition, on April 13, 2021, the Government produced over 20,000 pages of
Page: EFTA00029571 →1 mention
ally found that disclosures made approximately 30 to 45 days prior to trial constitute "reasonable notice" to defendants) (quoting United States v. Nachamie, 91 F. Supp. 2d 565, 577 (S.D.N.Y. 2000); Giffen, 379 F. Supp. 2d at 344 (Rule 404 does not obligate the Government to provide "unduly early notice
Page: EFTA00030576 →Sponsored
EFTA00040628.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00040628
) 6 United States v. Murgio, 209 F. Supp. 3d 698 (S.D.N.Y. 2016) 10 United States v. Muyet, 945 F. Supp. 586 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) 8 United States v. Nachamie, 91 F. Supp. 2d 565 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) 17 United States v. Nejad, No. 18-CR-224 (MN), 2019 WL 6702361 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 2019) 15 iv EFTA00040631
EFTA00085225.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00085225
ict. See, e.g., United States v. Rueb, No. 00-CR-91 (RWS), 2001 WL 96177, at *9 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 5, 2001) (thirty days before trial); United States v. Nachamie, 91 F. Supp. 2d 565, 580 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (fourteen days before trial). In addition, on April 13, 2021, the Government produced over 20,000 pages of
EFTA00090494.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00090494
ict. See, e.g., United States v. Rueb, No. 00-CR-91 (RWS), 2001 WL 96177, at *9 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 5, 2001) (thirty days before trial); United States v. Nachamie, 91 F. Supp. 2d 565, 580 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (fourteen days before trial). In addition, on April 13, 2021, the Government produced over 20,000 pages of
Sponsored
EFTA00092755.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00092755
ict. See, e.g., United States v. Rueb, No. 00-CR-91 (RWS), 2001 WL 96177, at *9 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 5, 2001) (thirty days before trial); United States v. Nachamie, 91 F. Supp. 2d 565, 580 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (fourteen days before trial). In addition, on April 13, 2021, the Government produced over 20,000 pages of
EFTA00092886.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00092886
ict. See, e.g., United States v. Rueb, No. 00-CR-91 (RWS), 2001 WL 96177, at *9 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 5, 2001) (thirty days before trial); United States v. Nachamie, 91 F. Supp. 2d 565, 580 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (fourteen days before trial). In addition, on April 13, 2021, the Government produced over 20,000 pages of
EFTA00103273.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00103273
ict. See, e.g., United States v. Rueb, No. 00-CR-91 (RWS), 2001 WL 96177, at *9 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 5, 2001) (thirty days before trial); United States v. Nachamie, 91 F. Supp. 2d 565, 580 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (fourteen days before trial). In addition, on April 13, 2021, the Government produced over 20,000 pages of
Sponsored
EFTA00103343.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00103343
ict. See, e.g., United States v. Rueb, No. 00-CR-91 (RWS), 2001 WL 96177, at *9 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 5, 2001) (thirty days before trial); United States v. Nachamie, 91 F. Supp. 2d 565, 580 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (fourteen days before trial). In addition, on April 13, 2021, the Government produced over 20,000 pages of
EFTA00103308.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00103308
ict. See, e.g., United States v. Rueb, No. 00-CR-91 (RWS), 2001 WL 96177, at *9 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 5, 2001) (thirty days before trial); United States v. Nachamie, 91 F. Supp. 2d 565, 580 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (fourteen days before trial). In addition, on April 13, 2021, the Government produced over 20,000 pages of
EFTA00103238.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00103238
ict. See, e.g., United States v. Rueb, No. 00-CR-91 (RWS), 2001 WL 96177, at *9 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 5, 2001) (thirty days before trial); United States v. Nachamie, 91 F. Supp. 2d 565, 580 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (fourteen days before trial). In addition, on April 13, 2021, the Government produced over 20,000 pages of
Sponsored
EFTA00104652.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00104652
ict. See, e.g., United States v. Rueb, No. 00-CR-91 (RWS), 2001 WL 96177, at *9 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 5, 2001) (thirty days before trial); United States v. Nachamie, 91 F. Supp. 2d 565, 580 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (fourteen days before trial). In addition, on April 13, 2021, the Government produced over 20,000 pages of
EFTA00105663.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00105663
ict. See, e.g., United States v. Rueb, No. 00-CR-91 (RWS), 2001 WL 96177, at *9 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 5, 2001) (thirty days before trial); United States v. Nachamie, 91 F. Supp. 2d 565, 580 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (fourteen days before trial). In addition, on April 13, 2021, the Government produced over 20,000 pages of
EFTA00154640.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00154640
ict. See, e.g., United States v. Rueb, No. 00-CR-91 (RWS), 2001 WL 96177, at *9 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 5, 2001) (thirty days before trial); United States v. Nachamie, 91 F. Supp. 2d 565, 580 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (fourteen days before trial). In addition, on April 13, 2021, the Government produced over 20,000 pages of
Sponsored
Connected Entities(20 of 134)
Giglio
PersonNER artifact - legal term or document reference misclassified as person
17 docs17 co-mentions
Ghislaine Maxwell
PersonBritish socialite and sex trafficker, daughter of Robert Maxwell, accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein
17 docs17 co-mentions
United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America
16 docs16 co-mentions
PE
Percevault
PersonSurname reference in documents
15 docs15 co-mentions
White Plains
LocationCounty seat of Westchester County, New York, United States
15 docs15 co-mentions
RU
Russo
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
15 docs15 co-mentions
TH
Thompson
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
15 docs15 co-mentions
NE
Nejad
PersonSurname reference in documents
15 docs15 co-mentions
Supreme Court
OrganizationHighest court of jurisdiction in the US
15 docs15 co-mentions
Hernandez
PersonAmbiguous surname - refers to multiple people in Epstein documents
15 docs15 co-mentions
BO
Bortnovsky
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
15 docs15 co-mentions
Brady
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
15 docs15 co-mentions
Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)
15 docs15 co-mentions
Leahy
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
14 docs14 co-mentions
JE
Jeffries
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
14 docs14 co-mentions
Reid Weingarten
PersonAmerican white-collar criminal defense attorney at Steptoe & Johnson, represented Jeffrey Epstein and other high-profile clients
14 docs14 co-mentions
SA
Salameh
PersonLegal case citation: United States v. Salameh (misclassified as PERSON)
14 docs14 co-mentions
TR
Tracy
PersonAmbiguous first name - refers to multiple Tracys including Tracy Chapell and Tracy Lofaro in Epstein documents
14 docs14 co-mentions
CU
Cunningham
PersonAmbiguous surname reference in Epstein documents
14 docs14 co-mentions
WE
Werner
PersonBishop of the Roman Catholic Church
14 docs14 co-mentions