15
Total Mentions
15
Documents
111
Connected Entities
Surname reference in documents
Percevault appears in legal case citations within court documents related to the Epstein case, specifically the Second Circuit case 'United States v. Percevault, 490 F.2d 126, 132 (2d Cir. 1974)' regarding pretrial discovery procedures.
All four mentions are identical legal citations appearing in what appear to be pretrial motions or scheduling orders in Epstein-related criminal proceedings. The citations reference a 1974 Second Circuit precedent about pretrial disclosure benefiting all parties. These are standard legal boilerplate citations used by attorneys to support arguments about discovery procedures, not references to a person connected to the Epstein case.

Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
Julie K. Brown
Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open

Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
James Patterson
Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network

Relentless Pursuit: My Fight for the Victims of Jeffrey Epstein
Bradley J. Edwards
Victims' attorney's firsthand account
cific concerns. "[I]n most criminal cases, pretrial disclosure will redound to the benefit of all parties, counsel, and the court." United States v. Percevault, 490 F.2d 126, 132 (2d Cir. 1974). In general, the Court will require the parties to negotiate a final, omnibus schedule to propose to the Court. T
Page: EFTA00020293 →cific concerns. "[I]n most criminal cases, pretrial disclosure will redound to the benefit of all parties, counsel, and the court." United States v. Percevault, 490 F.2d 126, 132 (2d Cir. 1974). In general, the Court will require the parties to negotiate a final, omnibus schedule to propose to the Court. T
Page: EFTA00022123 →cific concerns. "[I]n most criminal cases, pretrial disclosure will redound to the benefit of all parties, counsel, and the court." United States v. Percevault, 490 F.2d 126, 132 (2d Cir. 1974). In general, the Court will require the parties to negotiate a final, omnibus schedule to propose to the Court. T
Page: EFTA00029572 →tates ex rel. Lucas v. Regan, 503 F.2d 1, 3 n.I (2d Cir. 1974); United States v. Sebastian, 497 F.2d 1267, 1268-69 (2d Cir. 1974); United States v. Percevault, 490 F.2d 126, 132 (2d Cir. 1974). Further, disclosure of any statements of alleged co-conspirators would necessitate the identification of co-cons
Page: EFTA00030571 →EFTA00085225
cific concerns. "[I]n most criminal cases, pretrial disclosure will redound to the benefit of all parties, counsel, and the court." United States v. Percevault, 490 F.2d 126, 132 (2d Cir. 1974). In general, the Court will require the parties to negotiate a final, omnibus schedule to propose to the Court. T
EFTA00090494
cific concerns. "[I]n most criminal cases, pretrial disclosure will redound to the benefit of all parties, counsel, and the court." United States v. Percevault, 490 F.2d 126, 132 (2d Cir. 1974). In general, the Court will require the parties to negotiate a final, omnibus schedule to propose to the Court. T
EFTA00092755
cific concerns. "[I]n most criminal cases, pretrial disclosure will redound to the benefit of all parties, counsel, and the court." United States v. Percevault, 490 F.2d 126, 132 (2d Cir. 1974). In general, the Court will require the parties to negotiate a final, omnibus schedule to propose to the Court. T
EFTA00092886
cific concerns. "[I]n most criminal cases, pretrial disclosure will redound to the benefit of all parties, counsel, and the court." United States v. Percevault, 490 F.2d 126, 132 (2d Cir. 1974). In general, the Court will require the parties to negotiate a final, omnibus schedule to propose to the Court. T
EFTA00103273
cific concerns. "[I]n most criminal cases, pretrial disclosure will redound to the benefit of all parties, counsel, and the court." United States v. Percevault, 490 F.2d 126, 132 (2d Cir. 1974). In general, the Court will require the parties to negotiate a final, omnibus schedule to propose to the Court. T
EFTA00103343
cific concerns. "[I]n most criminal cases, pretrial disclosure will redound to the benefit of all parties, counsel, and the court." United States v. Percevault, 490 F.2d 126, 132 (2d Cir. 1974). In general, the Court will require the parties to negotiate a final, omnibus schedule to propose to the Court. T
EFTA00103308
cific concerns. "[I]n most criminal cases, pretrial disclosure will redound to the benefit of all parties, counsel, and the court." United States v. Percevault, 490 F.2d 126, 132 (2d Cir. 1974). In general, the Court will require the parties to negotiate a final, omnibus schedule to propose to the Court. T
EFTA00103238
cific concerns. "[I]n most criminal cases, pretrial disclosure will redound to the benefit of all parties, counsel, and the court." United States v. Percevault, 490 F.2d 126, 132 (2d Cir. 1974). In general, the Court will require the parties to negotiate a final, omnibus schedule to propose to the Court. T
EFTA00104652
cific concerns. "[I]n most criminal cases, pretrial disclosure will redound to the benefit of all parties, counsel, and the court." United States v. Percevault, 490 F.2d 126, 132 (2d Cir. 1974). In general, the Court will require the parties to negotiate a final, omnibus schedule to propose to the Court. T
EFTA00105663
cific concerns. "[I]n most criminal cases, pretrial disclosure will redound to the benefit of all parties, counsel, and the court." United States v. Percevault, 490 F.2d 126, 132 (2d Cir. 1974). In general, the Court will require the parties to negotiate a final, omnibus schedule to propose to the Court. T
EFTA00154640
cific concerns. "[I]n most criminal cases, pretrial disclosure will redound to the benefit of all parties, counsel, and the court." United States v. Percevault, 490 F.2d 126, 132 (2d Cir. 1974). In general, the Court will require the parties to negotiate a final, omnibus schedule to propose to the Court. T

White Plains
LocationCounty seat of Westchester County, New York, United States
Thompson
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents

Ghislaine Maxwell
PersonBritish socialite and sex trafficker, daughter of Robert Maxwell, accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein
Nachamie
PersonSurname reference in documents

Brady
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents

Hernandez
PersonAmbiguous surname - refers to multiple people in Epstein documents

Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)

Giglio
PersonNER artifact - legal term or document reference misclassified as person
Walker
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
Russo
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents

Leahy
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
Jeffries
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents

Reid Weingarten
PersonAmerican white-collar criminal defense attorney at Steptoe & Johnson, represented Jeffrey Epstein and other high-profile clients
Salameh
PersonLegal case citation: United States v. Salameh (misclassified as PERSON)
Cunningham
PersonAmbiguous surname reference in Epstein documents
Werner
PersonBishop of the Roman Catholic Church

Vernon
PersonAmbiguous name reference in legal citations and Epstein documents

United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America
FBI
OrganizationFederal Bureau of Investigation, domestic intelligence and security service of the United States

Eric Holder
PersonUnited States Attorney General from 2009 to 2015